Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Some beneficial effect on root caries from use of higher concentration fluoride toothpaste (5000 ppm F): Question: Is a high-fluoride toothpaste (5000 ppm F) effective for the management of root caries?

Yeung, C Albert·2014·Evidence-Based Dentistry

Abstract

Design Single-blind, multi-centre, parallel, randomised controlled trial. Intervention Adult patients (18-75 years) with 10 or more natural teeth, and one or more root caries lesion in a tooth not crowned or compromised were included. Patients were randomised to receive a high fluoride toothpaste, 1.1% sodium fluoride (5000 ppm F) or a regular toothpaste (1350 ppm F). Packaging was identical and standard brushes were also provided. Patients were strictly instructed to refrain from using toothpastes or toothbrushes other than the ones provided and restricted from using mouth rinses. Outcome measure The primary outcome measure was changes in the surface structure of the root caries lesions after the intervention. This was graded using a surface hardness score (HS) scale: Level 1: hard; Level 2: hard to leathery; Level 3: leathery; Level 4: leathery with local softening; Level 5: soft. Scores were recorded at baseline, three and six months. Examiners were masked to the group assignment. Results One hundred and thirty-five patients (test group: n = 67; control group: n = 68) with 318 identified root caries lesions were randomised. Five patients were lost to follow up, three in the test group and two in the control. The groups were similar at baseline. Overall there was no difference between the two groups for the overall HS (test group: HS = 3.4 ± 0.61; control group: HS = 3.4 ± 0.66; P = 0.8757, unpaired t-test). However the ANOVA revealed significantly better HS for the test gr…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400981

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Griffin SO, Regnier E, Griffin PM, Huntley V . Effectiveness of fluoride in preventing caries in adults. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 410–415. · DOI
  2. Heijnsbroek M, Paraskevas S, Van der Weijden GA . Fluoride interventions for root caries: a review. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007; 5: 145–152.
  3. Ekstrand KR, Poulsen JE, Hede B, Twetman S, Qvist V, Ellwood RP . A randomized clinical trial of the anti-caries efficacy of 5,000 compared to 1,450 ppm fluoridated toothpaste on root caries lesions in elderly disabled nursing home residents. Caries Res 2013; 47: 391–398. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe P, Marinho VC, Shi X . Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; Issue 1. Art. No.: CD 007868. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yeung, C. A.
Venue
Evidence-Based Dentistry
Published
2014-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
8-9
ISSN
  • 1462-0049
  • 1476-5446
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review