Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents

Ekstrand, K.R., Poulsen, J.E., Hede, B., Twetman, S., Qvist, V., Ellwood, R.P.·2013·Caries Research

Abstract

Root caries is prevalent in elderly disabled nursing home residents in Denmark. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tooth brushing with 5,000 versus 1,450 ppm of fluoridated toothpaste (F-toothpaste) for controlling root caries in nursing home residents. The duration of the study was 8 months. Elderly disabled residents (n = 176) in 6 nursing homes in the Copenhagen area consented to take part in the study. They were randomly assigned to use one of the two toothpastes. Both groups had their teeth brushed twice a day by the nursing staff. A total of 125 residents completed the study. Baseline and follow-up clinical examinations were performed by one calibrated examiner. Texture, contour, location and colour of root caries lesions were used to evaluate lesion activity. No differences (p values >0.16) were noted in the baseline examination with regards to age, mouth dryness, wearing of partial or full dentures in one of the jaws, occurrence of plaque and active (2.61 vs. 2.67; SD, 1.7 vs.1.8) or arrested lesions (0.62 vs. 0.63; SD, 1.7 vs. 1.7) between the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively. Mean numbers of active root caries lesions at the follow-up examination were 1.05 (2.76) versus 2.55 (1.91) and mean numbers of arrested caries lesions were 2.13 (1.68) versus 0.61 (1.76) in the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively (p < 0.001). To conclude, 5,000 ppm F-toothpaste is significantly more effective for controlling root caries lesion progression and promoting remineralization compared to 1,450 ppm F-toothpaste.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000348581

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1159/000047429 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1159/000325151 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00030.x · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00200.x · DOI
  5. 10.1159/000077753 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1990.tb00027.x · DOI
  7. 10.1177/00220345450240050201 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/154407370802000105 · DOI
  9. 10.1159/000049113 · DOI
  10. 10.1159/000317490 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00674.x · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1986.tb01765.x · DOI
  13. 10.1177/00220345970760110901 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00298.x · DOI
  15. 10.1159/000325154 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02742.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00219.x · DOI
  18. 10.3109/00016357.2011.568962 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb00574.x · DOI
  21. 10.1159/000016444 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1177/0022034510393346 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ekstrand, K. R., Poulsen, J. E., Hede, B., Twetman, S., Qvist, V., & Ellwood, R. P.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
391-398
ISSN
  • 0008-6568
  • 1421-976X
Cited by
89
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review