The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents
Abstract
Root caries is prevalent in elderly disabled nursing home residents in Denmark. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tooth brushing with 5,000 versus 1,450 ppm of fluoridated toothpaste (F-toothpaste) for controlling root caries in nursing home residents. The duration of the study was 8 months. Elderly disabled residents (n = 176) in 6 nursing homes in the Copenhagen area consented to take part in the study. They were randomly assigned to use one of the two toothpastes. Both groups had their teeth brushed twice a day by the nursing staff. A total of 125 residents completed the study. Baseline and follow-up clinical examinations were performed by one calibrated examiner. Texture, contour, location and colour of root caries lesions were used to evaluate lesion activity. No differences (p values >0.16) were noted in the baseline examination with regards to age, mouth dryness, wearing of partial or full dentures in one of the jaws, occurrence of plaque and active (2.61 vs. 2.67; SD, 1.7 vs.1.8) or arrested lesions (0.62 vs. 0.63; SD, 1.7 vs. 1.7) between the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively. Mean numbers of active root caries lesions at the follow-up examination were 1.05 (2.76) versus 2.55 (1.91) and mean numbers of arrested caries lesions were 2.13 (1.68) versus 0.61 (1.76) in the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively (p < 0.001). To conclude, 5,000 ppm F-toothpaste is significantly more effective for controlling root caries lesion progression and promoting remineralization compared to 1,450 ppm F-toothpaste.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For dentine, higher fluoride concentration is necessary to control caries.
“For dentine, higher fluoride concentration [19–23], higher frequency of use [24], or combination of methods of fluoride delivery [25] should be necessary to control caries; however, the evidence is not conclusive.”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
More fluoride is required to control root caries than is used for enamel.
“which support clinical data suggesting that more fluoride would be required to control root caries [19, 21, 22] than that used for enamel.”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
This model could be used to estimate the anti-caries potential of innovative toothpaste formulations with low fluoride concentration that could be recommended to control enamel caries in children, and formulations with high fluoride concentrations that have been suggested to control root caries in elderly people.
“Therefore, this model could be used to estimate the anti-caries potential of innovative toothpaste formulations with low fluoride concentration [46] that could be recommended to control enamel caries in children, and formulations with high fluoride concentrations, that have been suggested to control root caries in elderly people [19, 21, 22].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Sixteen S ‐squared over D ‐squared: A relation for crude sample size estimates
Lehr, R. (1992) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780110811 · Cited by 253
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1159/000047429 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000325151 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00030.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00200.x · DOI
- 10.1159/000077753 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1990.tb00027.x · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345450240050201 · DOI
- 10.1177/154407370802000105 · DOI
- 10.1159/000049113 · DOI
- 10.1159/000317490 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00674.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1986.tb01765.x · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345970760110901 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00298.x · DOI
- 10.1159/000325154 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02742.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00219.x · DOI
- 10.3109/00016357.2011.568962 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb00574.x · DOI
- 10.1159/000016444 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0022034510393346 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions
Slayton, R. L., Urquhart, O., Araujo, M. W. B., Fontana, M., Guzmán-Armstrong, S., Nascimento, M. M., Nový, B. B., Tinanoff, N., Weyant, R. J., Wolff, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.002 · Cited by 317
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekstrand, K. R., Poulsen, J. E., Hede, B., Twetman, S., Qvist, V., & Ellwood, R. P.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 391-398
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review