Cited by 37Infant Nutrition and HealthFood and Agricultural SciencesClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Negative effect of heat sterilization on the free amino acid concentrations in infant formula

Yeung, C-Y, Lee, H-C, Lin, S-P, Yang, Y-C, Huang, F-Y, Chuang, C-K·2006·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Infant formulas are often heat sterilized in hospitals where water contamination or nosocomial infection is a concern, but there are few studies of the effect of high heat on the nutritional value of infant formula. In particular, the effect of heat sterilization on free amino acid (FAA) concentrations is seldom discussed. In view of the importance of these nutrients for infant growth, we investigated the FAA concentrations of infant formula after heat sterilization. Powdered infant formulas were reconstituted with hot water (80 degrees C) in glass bottles and placed in an autoclave for 5 min at 105 degrees C and 5600 kg/m2 of pressure. Additional samples of formula were prepared by conventional methods to serve as controls. After autoclaving, we measured the FAA concentrations with ion exchange chromatography. The results were compared with those obtained after conventional preparation. We found a 19.5% lower amount of total protein after autoclaving compared with conventional preparation. Concentrations of total FAA were significantly lower after autoclaving (696.5 +/- 101.4 vs 899.4 +/- 152.2 micromol/l, P = 0.01). The concentrations of individual amino acids were also lower in autoclaved infant formulas, with differences ranging from -4.1 to 71.5% (mean 22.6%). Concentrations of certain amino acids were more than 30% lower, such as valine (71.5%), citrulline (61.1%), glutamine (60.6%), ethanolamine (54%), and lysine (39.2%). Both essential and nonessential amino acids wer…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602279

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeung, C.-Y., Lee, H.-C., Lin, S.-P., Yang, Y.-C., Huang, F.-Y., & Chuang, C.-K.
Affiliations
  • Mackay Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chuang, C-K
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2005-10-12
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
136-141
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W1969536569
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
infant formula, heat sterilization, autoclaving, free amino acids, amino acid catabolism, protein degradation, ammonia, urea, nutritional value, nosocomial infections, powdered infant formula, essential amino acids, non-essential amino acids, valine, lysine, glutamine, citrulline, monoethanolamine, protein denaturation, infant nutrition, reconstitution
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Ammonia, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Food Handling, Hot Temperature, Humans, Infant, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant, Newborn, Nutritive Value, Infant Formula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review