Cited by 17Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Like it or not, life‐extension research extends beyond biogerontology

Open access
de Grey, Aubrey D.N.J.·2005·The EMBO Reports

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.embor.7400565

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de Grey, A. D. N. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
de Grey, Aubrey D.N.J.
Venue
The EMBO Reports
Published
2005-11-01
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
1000-1000
ISSN
  • 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3178
OpenAlex
W2029362188
Cited by
17
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
lifespan extension, negligible senescence, special educational needs, biogerontology, engineering versus science, cellular senescence, rejuvenation
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Genetic Engineering, Geriatrics, Humans, Longevity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review