The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subunit architecture of multimeric complexes isolated directly from cells
Open accessAbstract
Recent developments in purification strategies, together with mass spectrometry (MS)‐based proteomics, have identified numerous in vivo protein complexes and suggest the existence of many others. Standard proteomics techniques are, however, unable to describe the overall stoichiometry, subunit interactions and organization of these assemblies, because many are heterogeneous, are present at relatively low cellular abundance and are frequently difficult to isolate. We combine two existing methodologies to tackle these challenges: tandem affinity purification to isolate sufficient quantities of highly pure native complexes, and MS of the intact assemblies and subcomplexes to determine their structural organization. We optimized our protocol with two protein assemblies from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (scavenger decapping and nuclear cap‐binding complexes), establishing subunit stoichiometry and identifying substoichiometric binding. We then targeted the yeast exosome, a nuclease with ten different subunits, and found that by generating subcomplexes, a three‐dimensional interaction map could be derived, demonstrating the utility of our approach for large, heterogeneous cellular complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Global analysis of protein expression in yeast
Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.-K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K., & Weissman, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02046 · Cited by 3,750
Cited by
Native mass spectrometry: a bridge between interactomics and structural biology
Heck, A. J. R. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1265 · Cited by 766
Mass Spectrometry: Bottom-Up or Top-Down?
Chait, B. T. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133987 · Cited by 441
The Role of Mass Spectrometry in Structure Elucidation of Dynamic Protein Complexes
Sharon, M., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.061005.090816 · Cited by 357
Self-citationZhou, M., Sandercock, A. M., Fraser, C. S., Ridlova, G., Stephens, E., Schenauer, M. R., Yokoi-Fong, T., Barsky, D., Leary, J. A., Hershey, J. W., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801313105 · Cited by 256
Self-citationThe diverse and expanding role of mass spectrometry in structural and molecular biology
Lössl, P., van de Waterbeemd, M., & Heck, A. J. (2016) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201694818 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Hernández, H., Dziembowski, A., Taverner, T., Séraphin, B., & Robinson, C. V.
- Venue
- EMBO reports
- Published
- 2006-05-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 605-610
- ISSN
- 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3178
- OpenAlex
- W2139261531
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subunit architecture of multimeric complexes isolated directly from cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.embor.7400702
- The paper
- Hernández, H., Dziembowski, A., Taverner, T., Séraphin, B., & Robinson, C. V. (2006). Subunit architecture of multimeric complexes isolated directly from cells. EMBO reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.