The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Falling off the academic bandwagon: Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100614541236 · Cited by 1,019
Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women
Sheltzer, J. M., & Smith, J. C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403334111 · Cited by 427
The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications
Ley, T. J., & Hamilton, B. H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165878 · Cited by 271
Gibbs, K. D., & Griffin, K. A. (2013) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-02-0021 · Cited by 261
PhD Student Experiences with the Impostor Phenomenon in STEM
Chakraverty, D. (2020) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/4513 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K. M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., Qiu, Y., Rayasam, G. V., Stavreva, D. A., & Cohen‐Fix, O.
- Venue
- EMBO reports
- Published
- 2007-10-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 977-981
- ISSN
- 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3178
- OpenAlex
- W2141143474
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Falling off the academic bandwagon: Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.embor.7401110
- The paper
- Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K. M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., Qiu, Y., Rayasam, G. V., Stavreva, D. A., & Cohen‐Fix, O. (2007). Falling off the academic bandwagon: Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. EMBO reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
