The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications
Abstract
Many qualified women scientists stop applying for NIH grants in the late postdoctoral and early faculty years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Women Physicians in Academic Medicine — New Insights from Cohort Studies
Nonnemaker, L. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002103420606 · Cited by 490
The Physician-Scientist Career Pipeline in 2005: Build It, and They Will Come
Ley, T. J., & Rosenberg, L. E. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.11.1343 · Cited by 361
Self-citationThe Relationship between Specialty Choice and Gender of U.S. Medical Students, 1990???2003
Lambert, E. M., & Holmboe, E. S. (2005) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200509000-00003 · Cited by 235
Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K. M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., Qiu, Y., Rayasam, G. V., Stavreva, D. A., & Cohen‐Fix, O. (2007) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401110 · Cited by 179
Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty
Waisbren, S. E., Bowles, H. R., Hasan, T. G., Zou, K. H., Emans, S. J., Goldberg, C., Gould, S., Levine, D., Lieberman, E., Loeken, M. R., et al. (2008) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0412 · Cited by 152
Women in Academic Medicine — Progress and Challenges
Hamel, M. B., Ingelfinger, J. R., Phimister, E. G., & Solomon, C. G. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme068143 · Cited by 146
Obstacles to Promotion? Values of Women Faculty about Career Success and Recognition
Buckley, L. M., Sanders, K. M., Shih, M., et al. (2000) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200003000-00021 · Cited by 129
Women in Academic Medicine: A Report of Focus Groups and Questionnaires, with Conjoint Analysis
Brown, A. J., Swinyard, W. R., & Ogle, J. (2003) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/154099903322643929 · Cited by 101
Witte, F. M., Stratton, T. D., & Nora, L. M. (2006) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.acm.0000232421.04170.d2 · Cited by 88
Becoming a Doctor, Starting a Family — Leaves of Absence from Graduate Medical Education
Jagsi, R., Tarbell, N. J., & Weinstein, D. F. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp078163 · Cited by 66
Cited by
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao0185 · Cited by 1,497
Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108 · Cited by 1,114
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100614541236 · Cited by 1,019
Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22784 · Cited by 1,000
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
Helmer, M., Schottdorf, M., Neef, A., & Battaglia, D. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21718 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Ley, T. J., & Hamilton, B. H.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2008-12-05
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 5907
- Pages
- 1472-1474
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1577520517
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1165878
- The paper
- Ley, T. J., & Hamilton, B. H. (2008). The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
