The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An investigation of inbreeding depression and purging in captive pedigreed populations
Open accessAbstract
We use regression models to investigate the effects of inbreeding in 119 zoo populations, encompassing 88 species of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians. Meta-analyses show that inbreeding depression for neonatal survival was significant across the 119 populations although the severity of inbreeding depression appears to vary among taxa. However, few predictors of a population's response to inbreeding are found reliable. The models are most likely to detect inbreeding depression in large populations, that is, in populations in which their statistical power is maximised. Purging was found to be significant in 14 populations and a significant trend of purging was found across populations. The change in inbreeding depression due to purging averaged across the 119 populations is <1%, however, suggesting that the fitness benefits of purging are rarely appreciable. The study re-emphasises the necessity to avoid inbreeding in captive breeding programmes and shows that purging cannot be relied upon to remove deleterious alleles from zoo populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Reduced fitness levels and shortened lifespans are also documented in such selectively bred populations [77,78].”
From Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The selective pressure to produce colour morphs often results in inbreeding depression, which refers to a reduction in biological fitness caused by the mating of closely related individuals [77].”
From Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- Adamec V, Cassell BG, Smith EP, Pearson RE (2006). Effects of inbreeding in the dam on dystocia and stillbirths in US Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 89: 307–314. · DOI
- Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005). Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235–242. · DOI
- Ashworth D, Parkin DT (1992). Captive breeding: can genetic fingerprinting help? In: Moore HDM, Holt WV, Mace GM (eds). Biotechnology and the Conservation of Genetic Diversity. Columbia University Press: New York. pp 135–149. · DOI
- Ballou JD (1997). Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. J Heredity 88: 169–178. · DOI
- Barrett SCH, Charlesworth D (1991). Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352: 522–524. · DOI
- Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Boerema AC (2000). Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? Predictions from Drosophila. J Evol Biol 13: 502–513. · DOI
- Boakes EH, Wang J (2005). A simulation study on detecting purging of inbreeding depression in captive populations. Genet Res (Cambr) 86: 139–148. · DOI
- Brewer BA, Lacy RC, Foster ML, Alaks G (1990). Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. J Hered 81: 257–266. · DOI
- Byers DL, Waller DM (1999). Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol System 30: 479–513. · DOI
- Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH (2002). Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 2347–2358. · DOI
- Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999). Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260–270. · DOI
- Crow JF, Kimura M (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row: New York.
- Day SB, Bryant EH, Meffert LM (2003). The influence of variable rates of inbreeding on fitness, environmental responsiveness and evolutionary potential. Evolution 57: 1314–1324. · DOI
- Fowler K, Whitlock MC (1999). The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations. Proc Roy Soc London B 266: 2061–2066. · DOI
- Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002). Introduction to Conservation Genetics. University Press: Cambridge. · DOI
- Frankham R, Gilligan DM, Morris D, Briscoe DA (2001). Inbreeding and extinction: effects of purging. Conserv Genet 2: 279–285. · DOI
- Fu YB, Namkoong G, Carlson JE (1998). Comparison of breeding strategies for purging inbreeding depression via simulation. Conserv Biol 12: 856–864. · DOI
- Gilligan DM, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2003). Dynamics of genetic adaption to captivity. Conserv Genet 4: 189–197. · DOI
- Hedrick P, Kalinowski ST (2000). Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol System 31: 139–162. · DOI
- Hedrick PW (1994). Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363–372. · DOI
- Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5: 299–314. · DOI
- Joron M, Brakefield PM (2003). Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424: 191–194. · DOI
- Kalinowski ST, Hedrick PW (2001). Inbreeding depression in captive bighorn sheep. Anim Conserv 4: 319–324. · DOI
- Kalinowski ST, Hedrick PW, Miller PS (2000). Inbreeding depression in the Speke's gazelle captive breeding program. Conserv Biol 14: 1375–1384. · DOI
- Keane B (1990). The effect of relatedness on reproductive success and mate choice in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Anim Behav 39: 264–273. · DOI
- Keller LF, Waller DM (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230–241. · DOI
- King HD (1939). Life processes in gray Norway rats during fourteen years in captivity. Am Anat Mem 17: 1–77.
- Lacy RC (2000). Should we select genetic alleles in our conservation breeding programs? Zoo Biol 19: 279–282. · DOI
- Lacy RC, Ballou JD (1998). Effectiveness of selection in reducing the genetic load in populations of Peromyscus polionotus during generations of inbreeding. Evolution 42: 900–909. · DOI
- Lacy RC, Petric A, Warneke M (1993). Inbreeding and outbreeding in captive populations of wild animal species. In: Thornhill NW (ed). The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding. University of Chicago Press: London. pp 352–374.
- Laikre L, Ryman N, Lundh NG (1997). Estimated inbreeding in a small, wild muskox Ovibos moschatus population and its possible effects on population reproduction. Biol Conserv 79: 197–204. · DOI
- Lande R, Schemske DW (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24–40. · DOI
- Latter BDH (1998). Mutant alleles of small effect are primarily responsible for the loss of fitness with slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148: 1143–1158. · DOI
- Li ZK, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu QY, Tabien R et al. (2001). Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158: 1737–1753. · DOI
- Liptak T (1958). On the combination of independent tests. Magyar Tud Akad Mat Kutato Int Kozl 3: 171–197.
- Marshall TC, Sunnucks P, Spalton JA, Greth A, Pemberton JM (1999). Use of genetic data for conservation management: the case of the Arabian oryx. Anim Conserv 2: 269–278. · DOI
- Miller PS, Hedrick PW (2001). Purging of inbreeding depression and fitness decline in bottlenecked populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 14: 595–601. · DOI
- Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ (1956). An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 42: 855–863. · DOI
- Mosteller F, Bush RR (1954). Selected quantitative techniques. In: Lindzey G (ed). Handbook of Social Psychology. Addison-Wesley: Cambridge, MA.
- Ohta T (1971). Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet Res (Cambr) 18: 277–286. · DOI
- Packer C, Pusey AE, Rowley H, Gilbert DA, Martenson J, O'Brien SJ (1991). Case study of a population bottleneck: Lions of the Ngorougoro Crater. Conserv Biol 5: 219–230. · DOI
- Ralls K, Ballou JD (1983). Extinction: lessons from zoos. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas L (eds). Genetics and Conservation: A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. Benjamin Cummings: Menlo Park, CA. pp 164–183.
- Ralls K, Ballou JD (1986). Captive breeding programs for populations with a small number of founders. Trends Ecol Evol 1: 19–22. · DOI
- Ralls K, Ballou JD, Templeton AR (1988). Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conserv Biol 2: 185–193. · DOI
- Ralls K, Brugger K, Ballou JD (1979). Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates. Science 206: 1101–1103. · DOI
- Reed DH, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2003). Inbreeding and extinction: effects of rate of inbreeding. Conserv Genet 4: 405–410. · DOI
- Reid JM, Arcese P, Keller LF (2003). Inbreeding depresses immune response in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia): direct and inter-generational effects. Proc Roy Soc London Ser B 270: 2151–2157. · DOI
- Ribble DO, Millar JS (1992). Inbreeding effects among inbred and outbred laboratory colonies of Peromyscus maniculatus. Can J Zool 70: 820–824. · DOI
- Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T (2004). Inbreeding in the Seychelles warbler: environment-dependent maternal effects. Evolution 58: 2037–2048. · DOI
- Rumball W, Franklin IR, Frankham R, Sheldon BL (1994). Decline in heterozygosity under full-sibs and double first-cousin inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 136: 1039–1049. · DOI
- Saccheri IJ, Brakefield PM, Nichols RA (1996). Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50: 2000–2013. · DOI
- Sausman KA (1984). Survival of captive-born Ovis canadensis in North American zoos. Zoo Biol 3: 111–121. · DOI
- Scobie P (1997). Single Population Animal Records Keeping System. International Species Information System (ISIS): St Paul, MN.
- Signer EN, Schmidt CR, Jeffreys AJ (1994). DNA variability and parentage testing in captive Waldrapp ibises. Mol Ecol 3: 291–300. · DOI
- Simmons MJ, Crow JF (1977). Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet 11: 49–78. · DOI · Paper page
- Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004). Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 15261–15264. · DOI
- Swanson-Wagner RA, Jia Y, DeCook R, Borsuk LA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS (2006). All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6805–6810. · DOI
- Swindell WR, Bouzat JL (2006). Ancestral inbreeding reduces the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60: 762–767. · DOI
- Templeton AR, Hemmer H, Mace G, Seal US, Shields WM, Woodruff DS (1986). Local adaptation, coadaptation and population boundaries. Zoo Biol 5: 115–125. · DOI
- Templeton AR, Read B (1983). The elimination of inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke's gazelle. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL (eds). Genetics and Conservation: A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. Benjamin Cummings: Menlo Park, CA. pp 241–261.
- Templeton AR, Read B (1984). Factors eliminating inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke's Gazelle (Gazella spekei). Zoo Biol 3: 177–199. · DOI
- Thevenon S, Couvet D (2002). The impact of inbreeding depression on population survival depending on demographic parameters. Anim Conserv 5: 53–60. · DOI
- Venables WN, Ripley BD (1999). Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus, 3rd edn. Springer: New York. · DOI
- Wang J (2000). Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations. Genet Res (Cambr) 76: 75–86. · DOI
- Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1999). Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet Res (Cambr) 74: 165–178. · DOI
- Willis JH (1999). The role of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 53: 1678–1691. · DOI
- Willis K, Wiese RJ (1997). Elimination of inbreeding depression from captive populations: Speke's gazelle revisited. Zoo Biol 16: 9–16. · DOI
- Zschokke S, Baur B (2002). Inbreeding, outbreeding, infant growth, and size dimorphism in captive Indian rhinoceros. Can J Zool 80: 2014–2023. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palstra, F., & Ruzzante, D. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03842.x · Cited by 626
“…size has been demonstrated empirically under controlled conditions (laboratory: Frankham 2005; Swindell & Bouzat 2006c; Wright et al. 2007; animals in captivity: Ralls et al. 1979; Ballou & Ralls 1982; Boakes et al. 2007) as well as in the wild (Crnokrak & Roff 1999; Keller & Waller 2002).”
BackgroundGenetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers
Hedrick, P. W., & Fredrickson, R. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-009-9999-5 · Cited by 361
“Other management approaches that have been recommended in conservation genetics are more controversial, such as purging inbreeding depression (Boakes et al. 2007) or supplementation of natural populations with captive-raised individuals (Ryman and Laikre 1991).”
BackgroundGenomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild
Kardos, M. D., Taylor, H. R., Ellegren, H., Luikart, G., & Allendorf, F. W. (2016) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12414 · Cited by 405
Willi, Y., Kristensen, T. N., Sgrò, C. M., Weeks, A. R., Ørsted, M., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2105076119 · Cited by 281
Witzenberger, K. A., & Hochkirch, A. (2011) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0074-4 · Cited by 282
“However, without genetic analyses it is not possible to assess the accuracy of studbook data (Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInbreeding depression across the lifespan in a wild mammal population
Huisman, J., Kruuk, L., Ellis, P. A., Clutton-Brock, T., & Pemberton, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518046113 · Cited by 266
Conservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history
Bouzat, J. L. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0049-0 · Cited by 289
“review of the experimental evidence by Crnokrak and Barrett (2002) and of studies from captive populations by Boakes et al. (2007) suggest, however, that purging may not be a strong force in small populations.”
BackgroundRalls, K., Sunnucks, P., Lacy, R. C., & Frankham, R. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108784 · Cited by 267
Inbreeding Depression Is Purged in the Invasive Insect Harmonia axyridis
Facon, B., Hufbauer, R. A., Tayeh, A., Loiseau, A., Lombaert, É., Vitalis, R., Guillemaud, T., Lundgren, J. G., & Estoup, A. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.068 · Cited by 210
“, ranging from 40–300 individuals, depending upon intensity of selection) and the mutations leading to inbreeding depression should be strongly deleterious and highly recessive [3, 7].”
BackgroundInfluentialHoward, J., Pryce, J. E., Baes, C. F., & Maltecca, C. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-12787 · Cited by 260
Khan, A., Patel, K., Shukla, H. G., Viswanathan, A., van der Valk, T., Borthakur, U., Nigam, P., Zachariah, A., Jhala, Y. V., Kardos, M. D., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2023018118 · Cited by 201
Inbreeding depression due to recent and ancient inbreeding in Dutch Holstein–Friesian dairy cattle
Doekes, H. P., Veerkamp, R. F., Bijma, P., de Jong, G., Hiemstra, S. J., & WINDIG, J. J. (2019) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-019-0497-z · Cited by 240
Genetic rescue in a severely inbred wolf population
Åkesson, M., Liberg, O., Sand, H., Wabakken, P., Bensch, S., & Flagstad, Ø. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13797 · Cited by 128
“…alleles could have reduced inbreeding depression, but empirical studies suggest that purging is inefficient in small populations (Hedrick 1994; Wang 2000; Boakes et al. 2007), and that detrimental alleles may instead be randomly fixed by genetic drift, increasing the genetic load (Wang 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialGarcía-Dorado, A. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.135541 · Cited by 124
“…population size shrinks plays an important role on the evolution of different biological mechanisms that can allow populations to deal with their load, as diploidy, sexual reproduction, recombination, or breeding population structure (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1987; Kondrashov and Crow 1991).”
BackgroundCaballero, A., Bravo, I., & Wang, J.-L. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2016.80 · Cited by 119
“This load, when exposed by inbreeding, is responsible for at least part of the decline in fitness traits (inbreeding depression) ubiquitous in all captive populations and species at the verge of extinction (Hedrick and Kalinowski, 2000; Boakes et al., 2007; Charlesworth and Willis, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe impacts of inbreeding, drift and selection on genetic diversity in captive breeding populations
Willoughby, J., Fernández, N., Lamb, M. C., Ivy, J., Lacy, R. C., & DeWoody, J. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13020 · Cited by 115
“Particularly with respect to minimizing MK breeder selection protocols, pedigree-based methods have proven effective at minimizing the loss of genetic diversity (Lacy 2009) although inbreeding depression still occurs in some captive populations (Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundCongenital bone deformities and the inbred wolves (Canis lupus) of Isle Royale
Räikkönen, J., Vucetich, J. A., Peterson, R. O., & Nelson, M. P. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.014 · Cited by 105
“For example, purging is now understood to be unreliable for mitigating inbreeding depression (Boakes et al., 2007; see also Lynch and Walsh, 1998).”
BackgroundInbreeding Depression Accumulation across Life‐History Stages of the Endangered Takahe
Grueber, C., Laws, R., Nakagawa, S., & Jamieson, I. (2010) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01549.x · Cited by 96
A new theory for the evolution of polyandry as a means of inbreeding avoidance
Cornell, S. J., & Tregenza, T. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0926 · Cited by 89
VIRAL EPIZOOTIC REVEALS INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN A HABITUALLY INBREEDING MAMMAL
Ross-Gillespie, A., O'Riain, M. J., & Keller, L. (2007) · Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00177.x · Cited by 95
“…studies, both theoretical (Wang et al. 1999; Wang 2000; Whitlock 2002; Glémin 2003) and empirical (Bar- rett and Charlesworth 1991; Ballou 1997; Lacy and Ballou 1998; Byers and Waller 1999; Crnokrak and Barrett 2002; Boakes et al. 2007), have demonstrated that purging is not always effective.”
BackgroundGrueber, C., Wallis, G., & Jamieson, I. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03910.x · Cited by 91
“Crnokrak & Roff 1999; Keller & Waller 2002) and the minimisation of inbreeding is a goal of many conservation programmes (e.g. Amos & Balmford 2001; Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundKennedy, E., Grueber, C., Duncan, R., & Jamieson, I. (2014) · Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12315 · Cited by 88
Purging of inbreeding depression within the Irish Holstein-Friesian population
McParland, S., Kearney, F., & Berry, D. (2009) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-16 · Cited by 85
“This biases the regression of inbreeding on performance and therefore estimates of inbreeding depression may be regressed towards zero [10].”
BackgroundResultThe genetics of reintroductions: inbreeding and genetic drift
Keller, L., Biebach, I., Ewing, S. R., & Hoeck, P. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9781444355833.ch11 · Cited by 79
Brekke, P., Bennett, P., Santure, A., & Ewen, J. (2011) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04923.x · Cited by 79
“effect of genetic diversity loss and inbreeding depression in the wild is still uncertain (Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundHigh genetic load in an old isolated butterfly population
Mattila, A. L. K., Duplouy, A., Kirjokangas, M., Lehtonen, R., Rastas, P., & Hanski, I. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1205789109 · Cited by 78
“Other studies have previously reported that purging may not effectively reduce inbreeding depression in all traits (63, 64).”
BackgroundBittles, A. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139015844 · Cited by 77
Ensslin, A., Tschöpe, O., Burkart, M., & Joshi, J. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.012 · Cited by 76
Royal dynasties as human inbreeding laboratories: the Habsburgs
Ceballos, F. C., & Ortiz-Álvarez, G. (2013) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2013.25 · Cited by 79
“…purged within a consanguineous population because the selection efficiency against deleterious recessive alleles is increased by inbreeding (Hedrick, 1994; Ballou, 1997; Wang et al., 1999; Crnokrak and Barrett, 2002; Glémin, 2003; Boakes and Wang, 2005; Boakes et al., 2007; Garcı́a-Dorado, 2012).”
BackgroundFox, C. W., Scheibly, K. L., & Reed, D. H. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00441.x · Cited by 103
“Purging of deleterious alleles via inbreeding is often observed in captive animal populations, but its impact is relatively small and highly variable (Ballou 1997; Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundPekkala, N., Knott, K., Kotiaho, J. S., Nissinen, K., & Puurtinen, M. (2014) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12145 · Cited by 66
“Although empirical evidence for the effectiveness of purging is inconsistent (see e.g. Byers and Waller 1999; Crnokrak and Barrett 2002; Boakes et al. 2007; Leberg and Firmin 2008), some empirical studies do suggest that the relationship between population fitness and inbreeding level can be…”
BackgroundA meta-analysis of birth-origin effects on reproduction in diverse captive environments
Farquharson, K., Hogg, C., & Grueber, C. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03500-9 · Cited by 63
Microsatellite Support for Active Inbreeding in a Cichlid Fish
Langen, K., Schwarzer, J., Kullmann, H., Bakker, T., & Thünken, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024689 · Cited by 61
“Theory predicts that recessive deleterious alleles – which when expressed in homozygotes are thought to be the main cause for inbreeding depression – can be purged from a population by selection [29,34,38,113–118].”
BackgroundFounder-specific inbreeding depression affects racing performance in Thoroughbred horses
Todd, E., Ho, S., Thomson, P., Ang, R. A., Velie, B., & Hamilton, N. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24663-x · Cited by 60
Social dispersal but with philopatry reveals incest avoidance in a polygynous ungulate
Linklater, W., & Cameron, E. Z. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.017 · Cited by 55
“Inbreeding is also not always avoided (Holand et al. 2007), perhaps because it may be innocuous unless if extreme or recurrent (e.g. Boakes et al. 2007).”
Wright, D. J., Spurgin, L. G., Collar, N., Komdeur, J., Burke, T. A., & Richardson, D. S. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12740 · Cited by 53
“Purging of the mutational load may alleviate this over time (Crnokrak & Barrett 2002), but its effectiveness in wild populations is uncertain (Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundZoo Conservation Biology: Frontmatter
Fa, J. E., Funk, S., & O'Connell, D. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511993435 · Cited by 53
Offspring survival changes over generations of captive breeding
Farquharson, K., Hogg, C., & Grueber, C. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22631-0 · Cited by 52
Naish, K. A., Seamons, T., Dauer, M., Hauser, L., & Quinn, T. P. (2013) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12185 · Cited by 45
“However, the outcomes of inbreeding are not always predictable (Boakes et al. 2006).”
BackgroundKey Genetic Parameters for Population Management
Wellmann, R., & Bennewitz, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00667 · Cited by 44
Laws, R., & Jamieson, I. (2011) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00388.x · Cited by 43
“Finally, failing to detect inbreeding depression in juvenile survival of Stewart Island robins may be due to partial purging of the inbreeding load, via historical inbreeding and selection (Keller & Waller, 2002; Swindell & Bouzat, 2006b; Boakes et al., 2007; Bouzat, 2010).”
BackgroundSpeak, S. A., Birley, T., Bortoluzzi, C., Clark, M. D., Percival-Alwyn, L., Morales, H. E., & van Oosterhout, C. (2024) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13967 · Cited by 42
“However, given their often-small effective population size, the long-term viability of captive-bred populations is not guaranteed, and many show signs of inbreeding depression (Boakes et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow size and genetic diversity shape lifespan across breeds of purebred dogs
Kraus, C., Snyder‐Mackler, N., & Promislow, D. (2022) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-022-00653-w · Cited by 52
Prediction of the minimum effective size of a population viable in the long term
Pérez‐Pereira, N., Wang, J., Quesada, H., & Caballero, A. (2022) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-022-02456-z · Cited by 68
“Despite the effects of purging have often been considered weak or limited, to some extent supported by the apparent absence of purging (or weak purging) in several empirical analy‐ ses (Byers and Waller 1999; Reed et al. 2003a; Boakes et al. 2007), both theoretical and empirical results support that purging can be rel…”
ResultSelf-citationDirect and indirect causal effects of heterozygosity on fitness-related traits in Alpine ibex
Brambilla, A., Biebach, I., Bassano, B., Bogliani, G., & von Hardenberg, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1873 · Cited by 42
“A review conducted on mammals, however, revealed contrasting results, with purging not substantially reducing inbreeding depression [15].”
ResultInbreeding rate modifies the dynamics of genetic load in small populations
Pekkala, N., Knott, K. E., Kotiaho, J. S., & Puurtinen, M. (2012) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.293 · Cited by 44
“2001; Radwan 2003), and studies on captive populations of animals (Ballou 1997; Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundPopulation genetic diversity and fitness in multiple environments
Markert, J. A., Champlin, D., Gutjahr-Gobell, R., Grear, J., Kuhn, A., McGreevy, T. J. J., Roth, A., Bagley, M., & Nacci, D. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-205 · Cited by 41
“The impact of increased individual homozygosity on individual fitness has been extensively documented in both laboratory, semi-natural, and natural settings [2,5-9].”
Effects of inbreeding and parental incubation on captive breeding success in Hawaiian crows
Hoeck, P. E. A., Wolak, M. E., Switzer, R. A., Kuehler, C., & Lieberman, A. A. (2015) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.011 · Cited by 41
García-Dorado, A. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.28 · Cited by 39
Detection of barriers to dispersal is masked by long lifespans and large population sizes
Hoffman, J. R., Willoughby, J., Swanson, B., Pangle, K., & Zanatta, D. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3470 · Cited by 37
Plough, L. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05688.x · Cited by 37
“The extent to which shifts in dominance are locus- and environment-specific may help to explain varying experimental results concerning purging (Byers & Waller 1999; Crnokrak & Barrett 2002; Boakes et al. 2007).”
ResultWindig, J., & Kaal, L. (2008) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731108003029 · Cited by 36
“Captive populations are often small and consequently inbreeding rates can be high with associated reductions in fitness (Meuwissen and Woolliams, 1994; Boakes et al., 2007; Oldenbroek, 2007).”
BackgroundEstimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions
López-Cortegano, E., Vilas, A., Caballero, A., & García-Dorado, A. (2016) · Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12983 · Cited by 35
Weiser, E., Grueber, C., Kennedy, E., & Jamieson, I. (2016) · Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12840 · Cited by 35
“This corresponds to expectations that purging will not be efficient in a small population in which genetic drift may override weak to moderate selection (Hedrick 1994; Keller and Waller 2002; Glémin 2003; Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundNyman, T., Valtonen, M., Aspi, J., Ruokonen, M., Kunnasranta, M., & Palo, J. (2014) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1193 · Cited by 35
“However, experimental evidence and investigations of captive populations have cast doubt on the existence or effectiveness of purging (Boakes et al. 2007; Leberg and Firmin 2008).”
BackgroundKristensen, T., Loeschcke, V., & Hoffmann, A. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00816.x · Cited by 34
“Nevertheless, experimental evidence supporting purging is limited, and studies often show that purging has limited success in reducing inbreeding depression in variable environments when applied to small populations (e.g., Ballou 1997; Jamieson et al. 2003; Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMikkelsen, K., Loeschcke, V., & Kristensen, T. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-009-0030-y · Cited by 33
“These results support the conclusion from e.g. Boakes et al. (2007) that purging cannot be used as a management tool in conservation biology.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLong-term exhaustion of the inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster
Pérez‐Pereira, N., Pouso, R., Rus, A., Vilas, A., López‐Cortegano, E., García‐Dorado, A., Quesada, H., & Caballero, A. (2021) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-021-00464-3 · Cited by 33
Trask, A., Ferrie, G., Wang, J., Newland, S., Canessa, S., Moehrenschlager, A., Laut, M., Duenas, L. B., & Ewen, J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79979-4 · Cited by 32
“We modelled four scenarios of (1) average management and (2) increased breeding management, as well as harvests under (3) average management and (4) increased breeding management.”
MethodSelf-citationImplications of size‐selective fisheries on sexual selection
Uusi‐Heikkilä, S. (2020) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12988 · Cited by 35
Larsen, L.-K., Pélabon, C., Bolstad, G. H., Viken, Å., Fleming, I., & Rosenqvist, G. (2011) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02224.x · Cited by 29
“Despite the acknowledged importance that purging can have on inbreeding depression, the occurrence and efficiency of purging remain actively debated (Ballou, 1997; Byers & Waller, 1999; Crnokrak & Barrett, 2002; Boakes et al., 2007).”
BackgroundFarquharson, K., Hogg, C., & Grueber, C. (2017) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esx030 · Cited by 28
“For example, inbreeding can contribute to declines in breeding success in conservation programs (Boakes et al. 2007), although variation in pedigree-based inbreeding metrics was too low to include these parameters in our analyses of devil.”
BackgroundHammerly, S. C., de la Cerda, D. A., Bailey, H., & Johnson, J. A. (2015) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12247 · Cited by 59
Hedrick, P. (2014) · doi:10.1111/acv.12064 · Cited by 27
Roderick, G., Croucher, P., Vandergast, A., & Gillespie, R. (2012) · Evolutionary biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-012-9184-5 · Cited by 27
“In ephemeral habitats, migration is necessary for populations to persist (see Denno et al. 1991), while in more stable habitats, not only is gene flow unnecessary, but limited gene flow can allow populations to diverge by chance alone (Wright 1968).”
BackgroundGenetic purging in captive endangered ungulates with extremely low effective population sizes
López‐Cortegano, E., Moreno, E., & García‐Dorado, A. (2021) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-021-00473-2 · Cited by 25
Hedrick, P. (2011) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esr082 · Cited by 25
“As a result, the expected effect on lowering fitness would be less than that from one-generation inbreeding of the same level because of the opportunity for purging of detrimental variants (Hedrick 1994; Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundInbreeding in natural mammal populations: historical perspectives and future challenges
Hasselgren, M., & Norén, K. (2019) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12169 · Cited by 28
The purge of genetic load through restricted panmixia in a Drosophila experiment
Ávila, V., Amador, C., & García-Dorado, A. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02058.x · Cited by 23
“The efficiency of inbreeding to reduce d has been studied by analysing fitness in pedigreed data from cattle breeds and from zoo endangered populations (Boakes et al., 2007; Gulisija & Crow, 2007).”
BackgroundPersistent Genomic Erosion in Whooping Cranes Despite Demographic Recovery
Fontsere, C., Speak, S. A., Caven, A. J., Rodríguez, J. A., Wang, X., Pacheco, C., Cassatt‐Johnstone, M., Femerling, G., Maloney, B., Balacco, J., et al. (2025) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.70088 · Cited by 26
“This highlights the long-term genetic impact of founder events, where small initial populations continue to affect diversity despite in-breeding management (Boakes et al. 2007).”
Schielzeth, H., Burger, C., Bolund, E., & Forstmeier, W. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.014 · Cited by 22
“…benefits of inbreeding (Kokko & Ots 2006), empirical evidence is in clear favour of inbreeding avoidance (Pusey & Wolf 1996; Keller & Waller 2002; Kruuk et al. 2002; Armbruster & Reed 2005; O’Grady et al. 2006; Boakes et al. 2007; but see Pusey & Wolf 1996 for studies that failed to show it).”
BackgroundRESPONSE TO SELECTION ON COLD TOLERANCE IS CONSTRAINED BY INBREEDING
Dierks, A., Baumann, B., & Fischer, K. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01604.x · Cited by 19
Gibbs, H., & Chiucchi, J. E. (2012) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-012-0360-z · Cited by 21
“…Conservation Partnership, Ohio State University, 300 Aronoff Laboratory, 318 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1293, USA J. E. Chiucchi Center for Life Sciences Education, Ohio State University, 260 Jennings Hall, 1735 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1293, USA 2001; Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundA Simple Method to Account for Natural Selection When Predicting Inbreeding Depression
García-Dorado, A. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.090597 · Cited by 21
“Significant effects of purging have been repeatedly reported for plants and animals (see the recent survey by Gulisija and Crow 2007) but attempts to empirically derive a predictive approach of its magnitude have proved elusive (Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundBetter Fitness in Captive Cuvier’s Gazelle despite Inbreeding Increase: Evidence of Purging?
Moreno, E., Pérez‐González, J., Carranza, J., & Moya‐Laraño, J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145111 · Cited by 23
“[8] argued against this practice in zoo populations of threatened species in spite of finding evidence of purging in some of the populations they studied (see [9] for a review).”
BackgroundWitzenberger, K., & Hochkirch, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106083 · Cited by 20
“The influence of captive breeding on the genetic diversity of endangered species has already been subject to a number of theoretic and genetic studies [7,14–16,17].”
BackgroundLimited inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population is age but not environment dependent
Laws, R., Townsend, S. M., Nakagawa, S., & Jamieson, I. (2010) · doi:10.1111/j.1600-048x.2010.05164.x · Cited by 20
“…due to reduced genetic load (i.e. genetic purging) are thought to be rather restrictive in natural populations, and supporting evidence for purging in wild or even captive populations is contentious (Byers and Waller 1999, Crnokrak and Barrett 2002, Keller and Waller 2002, Boakes et al. 2007).”
BackgroundWild genes boost the survival of captive‐bred individuals in the wild
Sahashi, G., & Morita, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2457 · Cited by 19
Bersabé, D., & García-Dorado, A. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12054 · Cited by 19
Population viability analysis on domestic horse breeds (Equus caballus).
Thirstrup, J. P., Bach, L. A., Loeschcke, V., & Pertoldi, C. (2009) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1760 · Cited by 19
“…survival are well documented in wild (Crnokrak and Roff, 1999; Hedrick and Kalinowski, 2000) and captive populations (Kristensen and Sørensen, 2005; Boakes et al., 2007), but no overall correlation between inbreeding, microsatellite heterozygosity, and mean squared allelic distance (d2) in…”
BackgroundAtkinson, K. E., Kitchener, A. C., Tobe, S. S., & O'Donoghue, P. (2018) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2017.10.001 · Cited by 17
Guidelines for evaluating the conservation value of African lion (Panthera leo) translocations
Becker, M. S., Almeida, J., Begg, C. M., Bertola, L. D., Breitenmoser‐Würsten, C., Breitenmoser, U., Coals, P. G. R., Funston, P. J., Gaylard, A., Groom, R. J., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2022.963961 · Cited by 19
“There are considerable risks associated with such reintroductions, including potential inbreeding de fi cits (Boakes et al., 2007; Leberg and Firman, 2007), a lack of clarity regarding the genetic origin of captive animals (Williams et al., 2021), elevated risks that they are habituated to humans…”
BackgroundPredictive Model and Software for Inbreeding-Purging Analysis of Pedigreed Populations
García-Dorado, A., Wang, J.-L., & López-Cortegano, E. (2016) · G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.116.032425 · Cited by 16
Self-citationCoillie, S. V., Galbusera, P., Roeder, A. D., Schempp, W., Stevens, J., Leus, K., Reinartz, G., & Pereboom, Z. (2008) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00186.x · Cited by 16
An insight into population structure and gene flow within pure-bred cats.
Leroy, G., Vernet, E., Pautet, M. B., & Rognon, X. (2014) · Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · doi:10.1111/jbg.12043 · Cited by 15
Paul, K., D'Ambrosio, J., & Phocas, F. (2021) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.13308 · Cited by 14
“Purging tends to regress inbreeding depression towards zero because homozygosity in some genomic regions is no longer unfavourable (Boakes et al., 2007).”
BackgroundBlanco, G., Morinha, F., Roques, S., Hiraldo, F., Rojas, A., & Tella, J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79575-6 · Cited by 14
López‐Cortegano, E., Bersabé, D., Wang, J., & García‐Dorado, A. (2018) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-017-0045-y · Cited by 16
Self-citationVariable inbreeding effects across life‐history stages in a captive carnivorous mammal population
Bilski, D. R., Pie, M., & Passos, F. D. C. (2013) · doi:10.1111/acv.12038 · Cited by 14
“In addition, although there have been few studies considering the effects of parental inbreeding (e.g. Ballou, 1997; Boakes et al., 2007), they commonly use the individual inbreeding coefficient as the predictor variable (Kalinowski, Hedrick & Miller, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialFu, C.-Z., Guang, X., Wan, Q., & Fang, S. (2019) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evz149 · Cited by 15
A multivariate analysis with direct additive and inbreeding depression load effects
Varona, L., Altarriba, J., Moreno, C., Martínez-Castillero, M., & Casellas, J. (2019) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-019-0521-3 · Cited by 12
Peng, L., Zou, M., Ren, N.-N., Xie, M., Vasseur, L., Yang, Y., He, W., Yang, G., Gurr, G., Hou, Y., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12749 · Cited by 12
Driscoll, C., Driscoll, J., Hazekamp, C., Mitton, J., & Wehausen, J. (2015) · doi:10.1002/jwmg.895 · Cited by 12
Flanagan, A. M., Masuda, B., Grueber, C., & Sutton, J. (2020) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13650 · Cited by 11
“…effect of inbreeding on ‘Alalā offspring survival suggests that genetic purging of recessive deleterious alleles in the population is incomplete and that allelic diversity remains (Weiser et al. 2015), despite the likely occurrence of ancestral inbreeding (Boakes et al. 2007; Sutton et al. 2018).”
BackgroundInbreeding depression for kit survival at birth in a rabbit population under long-term selection
Curik, I., Kövér, G., Farkas, J., Szendrő, Z., Romvári, R., Sölkner, J., & Nagy, I. (2020) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-020-00557-3 · Cited by 11
Genetic variability and structure of jaguar (Panthera onca) in Mexican zoos
Rueda-Zozaya, P., Mendoza-Martínez, G., Martínez-Gómez, D., Monroy-Vilchis, O., Godoy, J., Sunny, A., Palomares, F., Chávez, C., & Herrera-Haro, J. (2016) · Genetica · doi:10.1007/s10709-015-9878-6 · Cited by 11
“However, captive populations often begins with a small 89 number of individuals distributed in several breeding centers, partly due to spatial constraints 90 (Laikre 1999; Boakes et al. 2007), and if left unmanaged genetic drift and non-random 91 matings results in a rapid loss of genetic diversity and accumulation of…”
BackgroundStanton, D., Helsen, P., Shephard, J., Leus, K., Penfold, L., Hart, J., Kumpel, N., Ewen, J., Wang, J.-L., Galbusera, P., et al. (2015) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-015-0726-0 · Cited by 11
“It may also indicate an accumulation of genetic load due to relaxed selection, which may ultimately result in inbreeding depression (Boakes et al. 2006 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA novel breeding design to produce genetically protected homogenous fish populations for on-growing
Janhunen, M., Kause, A., Mäntysaari, E., Vehviläinen, H., Præbel, A., Järvisalo, O., Paananen, T., & Koskinen, H. (2013) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03190.x · Cited by 11
Ahlinder, J., Giles, B., & García-Gil, M. R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88128-4 · Cited by 10
No inbreeding depression in laboratory‐reared individuals of the parasitoid wasp Allotropa burrelli
Quaglietti, B., Tamisier, L., Groussier, G., Fleisch, A., Goff, I. L., Ris, N., Kreiter, P., Fauvergue, X., & Malausa, T. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2643 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Boakes, E. H., Wang, J., & Amos, W.
- Affiliations
- Zoological Society of London (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Boakes, E H
- Venue
- Heredity
- Published
- 2006-12-20
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172-182
- ISSN
- 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2540
- OpenAlex
- W2010618800
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Heredity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- inbreeding depression, purging, captive breeding, zoo populations, neonatal survival, deleterious alleles, pedigree management, conservation genetics, mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians
- MeSH terms
- Amphibians, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Animals, Zoo, Birds, Female, Inbreeding, Male, Mammals, Models, Genetic, Pedigree, Regression Analysis, Reptiles, Genetic Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review