Cited by 28Sexual function and dysfunction studiesHormonal and reproductive studiesSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Sexual functioning in a population-based study of men aged 40–69 years: the good news

Enzlin, P, Mak, R, Kittel, F, Demyttenaere, K·2004·International Journal of Impotence Research

Abstract

The aim of the study was to provide cross-sectional data on age-related sexual functioning of men aged 40-69 y. The study was a randomised age-stratified community-based sample survey. In all, 799 men from two comparable middle-sized areas of Belgium participated in the study. Trained male nurses visited each participant at home and conducted a structured interview during which the participants filled out the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The main outcome measures were scores on the IIEF questionnaire at item level. This study showed that 69% of the sample attempted to have intercourse during the past 4 weeks with an age-related increase in the proportion of sexually inactive men (11% at age 40-49 y; 25% at age 50-59 y; 52% at age 60-69 y; P=0.0001). Almost 90% of sexually active men reported to be able to get and keep an erection until completion of intercourse, to ejaculate with a feeling of orgasm, and reported to be satisfied with their sexual partner relation and their overall sex life. About 75% of sexually active men reported to be (very) highly confident about their erectile functioning. Only 15% of sexually inactive men reported a high to very high frequency and strong to very strong level of sexual desire. Whereas 26% still reported high to very high confidence in their erectile capacity, 34% reported to be moderately to (very) satisfied with their sexual life. This study showed that sexuality still matters at middle to high age and that it deserves to be regarded as an important and continuing aspect of the overall adaptation to getting older.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901221

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enzlin, P., Mak, R., Kittel, F., & Demyttenaere, K.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Enzlin, P
Venue
International Journal of Impotence Research
Published
2004-04-15
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
512-520
ISSN
  • 0955-9930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5489
OpenAlex
W2016263409
Cited by
28
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Impotence Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
male sexual function, erectile function, sexual desire, sexual inactivity, sexual satisfaction, middle-aged and older men, aging and sexuality, International Index of Erectile Function
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Belgium, Coitus, Ejaculation, Humans, Libido, Male, Middle Aged, Orgasm, Penile Erection, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Time Factors, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review