CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101Obesity, Physical Activity, DietBody Composition Measurement TechniquesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abdominal adiposity values associated with established body mass indexes in white, black and hispanic Americans. A study from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Okosun, IS, Tedders, SH, Choi, S, Dever, GEA·2000·International Journal of Obesity
DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801414
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether white, black and hispanic young (17-39y) and middle-aged (40-59y) adults, and elderly (60-90y) Americans have the same values of abdominal adiposity (estimated from waist circumference (WC) at the established levels of overweight (body mass index, BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2).Methods Data (n=16,120) from the US Third National Health and Nutrition Survey were utilized. Age-adjusted linear regression analyses were used to estimate gender- and ethnic-specific WC values corresponding to overweight and obesity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also employed to determine the choices of WC values corresponding to the established BMI cut-off points. With ROC, gender- and ethnic-specific cut-off points producing the best combination of sensitivity and specificity were selected as optimal thresholds for WC values corresponding to the established BMI cut-off points.Results WC values associated with the established BMI were lower in blacks and hispanics compared with whites. In men, the WC values that corresponded to overweight ranged from 89 to 106 cm, from 84 to 95 cm, and from 87 to 97 cm in whites, blacks and hispanics, respectively. The corresponding values for obesity ranged from 99 to 110 cm, from 96 to 107 cm, and from 97 to 108 cm. The WC values that corresponded to overweight in women ranged from 82 to 91 cm, from 81 in to 90 cm, and from 83 to 92 cm in whites, blacks and hispanics, respectively. The analogous values for obesity ranged from 94 to 101 cm, from 93 to 100cm, and from 94 to 101 cm.Conclusions The lack of higher WC values in blacks (particularly women) and hispanics at the same levels of BMI for whites challenges previously held assumptions regarding the role of abdominal adiposity in cardiovascular disease experienced by non-whites. Defining the anthropometric variables that satisfactorily describe reasons for ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease is one of the challenges for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801414

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Han TS, McNeill G, Baras P, Forester MA . Waist circumference predicts intra-abdominal fat better than waist∶hip ratio in women Proc Nutr Soc 1995 54: 152A (Abstr.).
  2. Norusis MJ . SPSS 9.0 for Windows Release 9.0. SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 101

Related

Metadata

Authors
Okosun, I., Tedders, S., Choi, S., & Dever, G.
Affiliations
Mercer University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-10
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
1279-1285
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
DOI
10.1038/sj.ijo.0801414
OpenAlex
W1989291110
Cited by
101
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
abdominal fat, waist circumference, body mass index, ethnic differences, racial and ethnic disparities, overweight, obesity, cardiovascular risk, anthropometric cut-off points, women, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, NHANES III
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Black or African American, Body Constitution, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Sex Factors, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review