Cited by 58Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Effects of cognitive–behavioural therapy on health-related quality of life in obese subjects with and without binge eating disorder

Marchesini, G, Natale, S, Chierici, S, Manini, R, Besteghi, L, Di Domizio, S, Sartini, A, Pasqui, F +3 more·2002·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective To measure the effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in obese patients, in relation to binge eating disorder.Design Longitudinal, clinical intervention study consisting of structured sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy, preceded by sessions chaired by a psychologist in subjects with binge eating.Subjects Two groups of obese patients (92 treated by cognitive-behavioural therapy (77 females); 76 untreated controls (67 female), selected from the waiting list (control group)). Of 92 treated patients, 46 had a binge eating disorder at psychometric testing and structured clinical interview.Measurements Health-related quality of life by means of Short-Form 36 questionnaire at baseline and after 3-5 months.Results Cognitive-behavioural treatment produced an average weight loss of 9.4+/-7.5 kg, corresponding to a BMI reduction of 3.48+/-2.70 kg/m(2). No changes were observed in the control group. All scales of HRQL improved in treated subjects (by 5-19%). In obese subjects with binge eating weight loss was lower in comparison to non-bingers (7.7+/-8.1 vs 11.1+/-6.6; P=0.034). However, the improvement in HRQL was on average larger, and significantly so for Role Limitation-Physical (P=0.006), Role Limitation-Emotional (P=0.002), Vitality (P=0.003), Mental Health (P=0.032) and Social Functioning (P=0.034). Bodily Pain was the sole scale whose changes paralleled changes in body weight.Conclusions The positive effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy, mainly in subjects with binge eating, largely outweigh the effects on body weight, resulting in a significant change in self-perceived health status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802073

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marchesini, G., Natale, S., Chierici, S., Manini, R., Besteghi, L., Di Domizio, S., Sartini, A., Pasqui, F., Baraldi, L., Forlani, G., & Melchionda, N.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Marchesini, G
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2002-08-21
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1261-1267
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2315735984
Cited by
58
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università di Bologna
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, binge eating disorder, obesity, health-related quality of life, weight loss, body mass index, role limitations, vitality, mental health, social functioning, bodily pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Bulimia, Female, Health, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review