Cited by 628Obesity, Physical Activity, DietBody Composition Measurement TechniquesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message – ‘keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’

McCarthy, H D, Ashwell, M·2006·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective To examine the influence of age and gender on the waist:height ratio (WHTR) in children and to compare changes over time in WHTR, a measure of central fatness in British children. Design Representative cross-sectional surveys in 1977, 1987 and 1997. Setting Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Participants Survey 1: children aged 5-16 years measured in 1977 (boys) and 1987 (girls) (BSI, n=8135) and Survey 2: children aged 11-16 measured in 1997 (NDNS, n=773). Outcome measures From Survey 1, waist: height ratio related to age and sex and the proportion of children with a WHTR greater than 0.500 (a boundary value suggested for adults). From Survey 2, comparison of WHTR in children with that from Survey 1 and the actual proportion of children with a WHTR greater than 0.500 compared with the expected proportion using the survey 1 as reference. Results WHTR decreased with age (P<0.01 for trend), with the mean WHTR being significantly lower in girls (P<0.01). WHTR was significantly greater in children in Survey 2 compared with those measured 10 and 20 years earlier in Survey 1 (P<0.0001). The proportion of children where WHTR exceeded the 0.500 boundary value in Survey 2 was 17% of boys and 11.7% of girls (against 5.0 and 1.5%, respectively, in Survey 1, P<0.0001). The increase in WHTR in boys exceeded that in girls. Conclusions Values of WHTR during the past 10-20 years have increased greatly showing that central fatness in children has risen dramatically. WHTR is more closely linked to childhood morbidity than body mass index (BMI) and we suggest it should be used as an additional or alternative measure to BMI in children as well as adults. A simple public health message that is the same for adults and children of both sexes and all ages could be stated as 'keep your waist circumference to less than half your height'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803226

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, H. D., & Ashwell, M.
Affiliations
  • London Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, H D
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2006-01-24
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
988-992
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2092284812
Cited by
628
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 29
FWCI
17.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
waist-to-height ratio, childhood obesity, waist circumference, age and sex differences, temporal trends, body mass index, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Aging, Anthropometry, Body Constitution, Body Height, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review