The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors affecting the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose
Abstract
Acetobacter xylinum E(25) has been applied in our studies in order to find optimal culture conditions for effective bacterial cellulose (BC) production. The strain displays significantly higher stability in BC production under stationary culture conditions. In contrast, intensive agitation and aeration appear to drastically reduce cellulose synthesis since such conditions induced formation of spontaneous cellulose nonproducing mutants (Cel-), which dominated in the culture. Mutation frequency strictly depends on the medium composition in agitated cultures. Enrichment of the standard SH and Yamanaka media with 1% ethanol significantly enhanced BC production in stationary cultures. Horizontal fermentors equipped with rotating discs or rollers were successfully applied in order to improve culture conditions. Relatively slow rotation velocity (4 rpm) and large surface area enabling effective cell attachment are optimal parameters for cellulose production. Physical properties of BC samples synthesized either in stationary cultures or in a horizontal fermentor revealed that cellulose from stationary cultures demonstrated a much higher value of Young's modulus, but a much lower value of water-holding capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,231
Cited by
Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production
Shoda, M., & Sugano, Y. (2005) · Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02931175 · Cited by 375
Production and Status of Bacterial Cellulose in Biomedical Engineering
Moniri, M., Boroumand Moghaddam, A., Azizi, S., Abdul Rahim, R., Bin Ariff, A., Zuhainis Saad, W., Navaderi, M., & Mohamad, R. (2017) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano7090257 · Cited by 319
Bacterial Nanocellulose toward Green Cosmetics: Recent Progresses and Challenges
Almeida, T., Silvestre, A. J. D., Vilela, C., & Freire, C. S. R. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22062836 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Krystynowicz, A., Czaja, W., Wiktorowska-Jezierska, A., Gon�alves-Mi?kiewicz, M., Turkiewicz, M., & Bielecki, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 189-195
- ISSN
- 1367-5435 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5535
- OpenAlex
- W2018182581
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.jim.7000303
- The paper
- Krystynowicz, A., Czaja, W., Wiktorowska-Jezierska, A., Gon�alves-Mi?kiewicz, M., Turkiewicz, M., & Bielecki, S. (2002). Factors affecting the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.7000303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.