Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients

Open access
Hedayati, S.S., Bosworth, H.B., Kuchibhatla, M., Kimmel, P.L., Szczech, L.A.·2006·Kidney International

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ki.5000308

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Hedayati, S. S., Bosworth, H. B., Kuchibhatla, M., Kimmel, P. L., & Szczech, L. A.
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
1662-1668
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079792711
Cited by
309
References
41
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.ki.5000308
The paper
Hedayati, S. S., Bosworth, H. B., Kuchibhatla, M., Kimmel, P. L., & Szczech, L. A. (2006). The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney International. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000308

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.