Cited by 243Memory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Possible mechanisms for atrophy of the human hippocampus

McEwen, B S·1997·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

Recently published work using MRI to image the human brain has revealed that the hippocampal formation undergoes a selective atrophy in diverse conditions such as Cushing's syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, recurrent depressive illness, normal aging preceding dementia and in Alzheimer's disease. Hippocampal shrinkage is usually accompanied by deficits in declarative, episodic, spatial and contextual memory performance and the hippocampal changes provide a neural substrate for changes in cognitive function that have been recognized to accompany these various conditions. The hippocampus has long been known as a target of stress hormones, and it is an especially plastic and vulnerable region of the brain. However, the prominence of the hippocampus as a glucocorticoid target has obscured the fact that other factors besides glucocorticoid hormones are involved in the process of hippocampal atrophy. Excitatory amino acids and NMDA receptors are prominent in their involvement in an animal model of hippocampal atrophy as well as in neuronal death. Further-more, the finding of hippocampal atrophy does not necessarily imply a permanent loss of cells, and this aspect deserves careful investigation, both to analyze the underlying anatomical changes and to investigate the possibility of pharmacological treatment to reverse the process. In cases where atrophy is due to cell loss, the time course of the disease process will provide much useful information about mechanism and offer the possibility of early intervention to arrest or slow the pathological process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.mp.4000254

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 243

Authors
McEwen, B. S.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
McEwen, B S
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
255-262
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2073531245
Cited by
243
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-41256)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
hippocampal atrophy, hippocampal neurodegeneration, glucocorticoid receptor, Cushing's syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, recurrent depression, normal aging, Alzheimer's disease, excitatory amino acids, NMDA receptor, neuronal cell death, memory impairment, stress hormones, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Atrophy, Mental Disorders, Hippocampus, Humans, Excitatory Amino Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review