Possible mechanisms for atrophy of the human hippocampus
Abstract
Recently published work using MRI to image the human brain has revealed that the hippocampal formation undergoes a selective atrophy in diverse conditions such as Cushing's syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, recurrent depressive illness, normal aging preceding dementia and in Alzheimer's disease. Hippocampal shrinkage is usually accompanied by deficits in declarative, episodic, spatial and contextual memory performance and the hippocampal changes provide a neural substrate for changes in cognitive function that have been recognized to accompany these various conditions. The hippocampus has long been known as a target of stress hormones, and it is an especially plastic and vulnerable region of the brain. However, the prominence of the hippocampus as a glucocorticoid target has obscured the fact that other factors besides glucocorticoid hormones are involved in the process of hippocampal atrophy. Excitatory amino acids and NMDA receptors are prominent in their involvement in an animal model of hippocampal atrophy as well as in neuronal death. Further-more, the finding of hippocampal atrophy does not necessarily imply a permanent loss of cells, and this aspect deserves careful investigation, both to analyze the underlying anatomical changes and to investigate the possibility of pharmacological treatment to reverse the process. In cases where atrophy is due to cell loss, the time course of the disease process will provide much useful information about mechanism and offer the possibility of early intervention to arrest or slow the pathological process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The hippocampus is more susceptible to damage by hypoglycemia and hypoxia than other brain regions.
“The hippocampus is more susceptible to damage by hypoglycemia and hypoxia than other brain regions (27–31).”
From Reduced glucose tolerance is associated with poor memory performance and hippocampal atrophy among normal elderly (2003) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- McEwen, B. S.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McEwen, B S
- ORCID
- McEwen, B S
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-262
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W2073531245
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-41256)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- hippocampal atrophy, hippocampal neurodegeneration, glucocorticoid receptor, Cushing's syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, recurrent depression, normal aging, Alzheimer's disease, excitatory amino acids, NMDA receptor, neuronal cell death, memory impairment, stress hormones, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection
- MeSH terms
- Atrophy, Mental Disorders, Hippocampus, Humans, Excitatory Amino Acids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review