Cited by 58Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Reduction in Acetylcholine Release in the Hippocampus of Dopamine D5 Receptor-Deficient Mice

Laplante, François, Sibley, David R, Quirion, Rémi·2004·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Activation of the dopamine D1-like receptor stimulates acetylcholine (ACh) release in the hippocampus, apparently through the molecularly defined d5 receptor. In the present study, we used a transgenic mouse completely deprived of functional d5 receptor (d5-/-) to confirm the role and elucidate the possible function of the d5 receptor subtype on hippocampal cholinergic neurotransmission. ACh release was measured using in vivo microdialysis in the mouse dorsal hippocampus of 4 months old homozygous (d5-/-), heterozygous (d5+/-), and the wild-type (d5+/+) littermates. Using the no net flux technique, a significant reduction in basal hippocampal ACh level was found in the d5-/- compared to d5+/- and d5+/+ mice. Moreover, the administration of SKF 38393, a D1-like receptor agonist, systemically (2.0 and 10.0 mg/kg ip), or locally through the dialysis probe (10 and 50 microM), produced a dose-dependent enhancement of ACh release in the d5+/+, a moderate stimulation in the d5+/- but had no effect in the d5-/- mice. Quantitative receptor autoradiography revealed significant increases in M1-like but not in M2-like muscarinic receptor binding sites in the hippocampal formation. These results confirm and extend the role of the d5 receptor in the modulation of hippocampal ACh release and provide evidence for long-term alteration of hippocampal cholinergic neurotransmission resulting from the absence of the d5 receptors including chronically reduced ACh release and change in M1-like rece…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300467

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laplante, F., Sibley, D. R., & Quirion, R.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Quirion, Rémi
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2004-04-21
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
1620-1627
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2062994804
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research
  • McGill University
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
dopamine D5 receptor, acetylcholine release, hippocampus, cholinergic neurotransmission, M1 muscarinic receptor, M2 muscarinic receptor, D1-like receptors, receptor knockout mice, SKF 38393
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Autoradiography, Extracellular Space, Hippocampus, Mice, Inbred C57BL, 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Microdialysis, Mice, Knockout, Dopamine Agonists, Receptor, Muscarinic M1, Receptors, Dopamine D5, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review