Cited by 242Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSmoking Behavior and Cessation

α6-Containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors dominate the nicotine control of dopamine neurotransmission in nucleus accumbens

Exley, Richard, Clements, Michael A, Hartung, Henrike, McIntosh, J Michael, Cragg, Stephanie J·2008·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Modulation of striatal dopamine (DA) neurotransmission plays a fundamental role in the reinforcing and ultimately addictive effects of nicotine. Nicotine, by desensitizing beta2 subunit-containing (beta2*) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) on striatal DA axons, significantly enhances how DA is released by reward-related burst activity compared to nonreward-related tonic activity. This action provides a synaptic mechanism for nicotine to facilitate the DA-dependent reinforcement. The subfamily of beta2*-nAChRs responsible for these potent synaptic effects could offer a molecular target for therapeutic strategies in nicotine addiction. We explored the role of alpha6beta2*-nAChRs in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and caudate-putamen (CPu) by observing action potential-dependent DA release from synapses in real-time using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry at carbon-fiber microelectrodes in mouse striatal slices. The alpha6-specific antagonist alpha-conotoxin-MII suppressed DA release evoked by single and low-frequency action potentials and concurrently enhanced release by high-frequency bursts in a manner similar to the beta2*-selective antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE) in NAc, but less so in CPu. The greater role for alpha6*-nAChRs in NAc was not due to any confounding regional difference in ACh tone since elevated ACh levels (after the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor ambenonium) had similar outcomes in NAc and CPu. Rather, there appear to be underlying differences in nAChR subtype function in NAc and CPu. In summary, we reveal that alpha6beta2*-nAChRs dominate the effects of nicotine on DA release in NAc, whereas in CPu their role is minor alongside other beta2*-nAChRs (eg alpha4*), These data offer new insights to suggest striatal alpha6*-nAChRs as a molecular target for a therapeutic strategy for nicotine addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1301617

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • α6β2* nAChRs have a critical and possibly dominant effect on dopaminergic neurotransmission in the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic system.

    “Indeed, ␣6␤2* nAChRs have been shown to have a critical and possibly dominant effect on dopaminergic neurotransmission in the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic system”
  • Nicotinic regulation of dopamine release likely involves an interplay between receptor activation and desensitization, and desensitization produces an effective channel block similar to that seen with nAChR antagonists.

    “In addition, studies using cyclic voltametry indicate that this regulation of dopamine release most likely represents a complex interplay between nicotinic receptor activation and desensitization (Exley et al., 2008;Meyer et al., 2008;Perez et al., 2008)”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 242

Authors
Exley, R., Clements, M. A., Hartung, H., McIntosh, J. M., & Cragg, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Cragg, Stephanie J
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2007-11-21
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
2158-2166
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2084304884
Cited by
242
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Parkinson's UK (G-4067, G-0808)
  • University of Oxford
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH053631)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM048677)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotine, dopamine release, nucleus accumbens, caudate-putamen, striatum, nicotine dependence, alpha-conotoxin MII, dihydro-beta-erythroidine, burst activity, acetylcholine
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Dihydro-beta-Erythroidine, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Drug Interactions, Electric Stimulation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nicotine, Nucleus Accumbens, Receptors, Nicotinic, Neostriatum, Nicotinic Agonists, Nicotinic Antagonists, Conotoxins, Mice, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review