Cited by 82Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurological disorders and treatments

Nicotinic receptor-mediated reduction in l-DOPA-induced dyskinesias may occur via desensitization

Open access
Bordia, Tanuja, Campos, Carla, McIntosh, J. Michael, Quik, Maryka·2010·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease are a significant clinical problem for which few therapies are available. We recently showed that nicotine reduces L-DOPA-induced abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) in parkinsonian animals, suggesting it may be useful for the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias. The present experiments were performed to understand the mechanisms whereby nicotine reduces L-DOPA-induced AIMs. We used a well established model of dyskinesias, L-DOPA-treated unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Dose-ranging studies showed that injection of 0.1 mg/kg nicotine once or twice daily for 4 or 10 days most effectively reduced AIMs, with no worsening of parkinsonism. Importantly, a single nicotine injection did not reduce AIMs, indicating that nicotine's effect is caused by long-term rather than short-term molecular changes. Administration of the metabolite cotinine did not reduce AIMs, suggesting a direct effect of nicotine. Experiments with the nicotinic receptor (nAChR) antagonist mecamylamine were done to determine whether nicotine acted via a receptor-mediated mechanism. Unexpectedly, several days of mecamylamine injection (1.0 mg/kg) alone significantly ameliorated dyskinesias to a comparable extent as nicotine. The decline in AIMs with combined nicotine and mecamylamine treatment was not additive, suggesting that nicotine exerts its effects via a nAChR interaction. This latter finding, combined with data showing that mecamylamine reduced AIMs to a similar extent as nicotine, and that nicotine or mecamylamine treatment both decreased alpha6beta2* and increased alpha4beta2* nAChR expression, suggests that the nicotine-mediated improvement in L-DOPA-induced AIMs may involve a desensitization block. These data have important implications for the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 6-OHDA-lesioned, L-DOPA-treated rats, repeated nicotine or mecamylamine reduced L-DOPA-induced abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs), whereas acute nicotine and cotinine did not. The similar effects of nicotine and mecamylamine, their non-additivity when combined, and parallel changes in α6β2* and α4β2* nAChRs suggest nicotine may act via nAChR desensitization/block.

Key findings

  • Nicotine dose-response: 0.1 mg/kg once daily for 4 days maximally reduced total, orolingual, and forelimb AIMs; 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg had no significant effect, and higher doses (0.25–0.75 mg/kg) also reduced AIMs but less pronouncedly. A single nicotine injection did not reduce AIMs; multiple-day dosing was required, with twice-daily 4-day treatment producing somewhat greater reduction and 10-day once-daily treatment no further reduction. Nicotine did not worsen parkinsonism: forelimb use asymmetry was unaffected, and L-DOPA-induced contralateral rotations were similar with saline (677 ± 230, n = 10) and nicotine (675 ± 166, n = 9).
  • Cotinine did not reduce AIMs: minipump cotinine at 2.5 or 5 mg/kg/day for 3 weeks had no effect on total, axial, orolingual, or forelimb AIMs despite plasma cotinine levels of 353 ± 126 and 1202 ± 61 ng/ml, respectively. Nicotine injection at 0.1 mg/kg yielded plasma cotinine of 202 ± 26 ng/ml, and minipump nicotine at 0.5 mg/kg/day yielded 115 ± 25 ng/ml, both associated with reduced AIMs.
  • Mecamylamine alone reduced AIMs: acute 2 mg/kg had no significant effect, but 4 days of 1.0 mg/kg significantly reduced total (p < 0.05), orolingual (p < 0.01), and forelimb (p < 0.05) AIMs, with a trend for axial AIMs. Combined 4-day nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) plus mecamylamine (1.0 mg/kg) was not additive and was similar to either drug alone.
  • Receptor binding: nicotine (0.2 mg/kg) or mecamylamine (1 mg/kg) daily for 14 days both significantly decreased striatal [125I]α-CtxMII/α6β2* binding and increased [125I]epibatidine/α4β2* binding on the unlesioned, but not lesioned, side (p < 0.01). The lesioned striatum showed a 99% decline in dopamine transporter binding (0.9 ± 0.2% of control).

Methods

  • Male Sprague-Dawley rats were unilaterally lesioned with 6-OHDA into the right medial forebrain bundle; rats turning more than four complete turns/minute after amphetamine were used. They received daily L-DOPA methyl ester (8 mg/kg) plus benserazide (15 mg/kg) s.c., and AIMs were scored for axial, orolingual, and forelimb components on a 0–4 scale over 3 h (maximum possible score 108).
  • Behavioral experiments used one set of 20 rats; drugs included nicotine (0.01–0.75 mg/kg injection; 0.1–2 mg/kg/day minipump), cotinine (2.5 or 5 mg/kg/day minipump), and mecamylamine (0.5–2 mg/kg), with ≥3-day washouts. Limb use asymmetry and L-DOPA-induced contralateral rotations assessed motor function; plasma cotinine was measured by EIA.
  • Binding studies used a separate set of 6-OHDA-lesioned rats treated daily for 14 days with nicotine (0.2 mg/kg) or mecamylamine (1 mg/kg); autoradiography measured α6β2* ([125I]α-CtxMII), α4β2* ([125I]epibatidine plus cold α-CtxMII), and dopamine transporter ([125I]RTI-121). Statistics used one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc, and p < 0.05 as significant.

Limitations

  • Stated: the mechanisms whereby nAChR-mediated desensitization decreases L-DOPA-induced AIMs remain to be investigated, and the nAChR subtypes responsible have not yet been elucidated. The lack of cotinine effect may be due to insufficient brain entry or to the mode of administration, and final efficacy requires a clinical trial.
  • Stated: L-DOPA-induced AIMs may be influenced by previous dosing of agonists and antagonists, although repeat experiments with the same doses yielded similar declines.
  • Evident from the text: findings are limited to unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, with no human data; desensitization is inferred rather than directly measured; receptor changes were measured in separate animals and only on the unlesioned side; behavioral data were pooled from one or two experiments with n = 9–10 per group.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/jpet.109.162396

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 58 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Saline-treated control rats had stable total L-DOPA-induced AIM scores across treatment regimes, with a mean of 69.1 ± 3.2.

    “Values for the saline-treated control rats remained stable over the different treatment regimes with a mean total L-DOPA-in- duced AIM score of 69.1 Ϯ 3.2 (n ϭ 54, which represent the scores from nine rats over six separate experiments).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Plasma cotinine levels 3 to 4 hours after a 0.1 mg/kg nicotine injection were 202 ± 26 ng/ml.

    “Measurement of plasma cotinine levels (Table 1) 3 to 4 h after injection of the 0.1 mg/kg nicotine dose yielded concentrations of 202 Ϯ 26 ng/ml (n ϭ 10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Three weeks of cotinine treatment at 2.5 or 5 mg/kg/day had no effect on total, axial, orolingual, or forelimb AIMs despite high plasma cotinine levels.

    “The results in Table 2 show that, despite high plasma cotinine levels, 3 weeks of cotinine treatment had no effect on total, axial, orolingual, or forelimb AIMs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Nicotine at 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg had no significant effect on L-DOPA-induced AIMs.

    “The results in Fig. 1 show that nicotine (0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg) treatments had no significant effect on L-DOPA-induced AIMs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Higher nicotine doses were associated with anxiety-like behaviors such as irritability and nervousness.

    “It should be noted that the higher doses were also associated with the development of anxietylike behaviors such as irritability and nervousness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 25
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nicotine at 0.1 mg/kg produced the largest reduction in total, orolingual, and forelimb AIMs, with a trend toward reduced axial AIMs.

    “However, 0.1 mg/kg nicotine resulted in a maximal reduction in total, orolingual, and forelimb AIMs with a trend for a decline in axial AIMs.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “Dose-ranging studies showed that injection of 0.1 mg/kg nicotine once or twice daily for 4 or 10 days most effectively reduced AIMs, with no worsening of parkinsonism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Higher nicotine doses of 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg/kg also significantly reduced total, orolingual, and forelimb AIMs, but the reductions appeared smaller than with 0.1 mg/kg.

    “Higher doses of nicotine (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg/kg) also resulted in significant reductions in total, orolingual, and forelimb AIMs; however, the declines appeared less pronounced than those observed with the 0.1 mg/kg dose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    There was a 99% decline in striatal dopamine transporter in the lesioned striatum compared to the unlesioned striatum.

    “The results in Table 3 show that there was a 99% decline in the transporter, as anticipated, attesting to the effectiveness of the lesioning paradigm (Cenci and Lundblad, 2007;Bordia et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    ANOVA showed a significant main effect of nicotine for once-daily 4-day treatment and twice-daily 4-day treatment, a trend for once-daily 10-day treatment, and no effect for the single dose.

    “Analyses of variance yielded a significant main effect of nicotine treatment with the once-daily injection (Fig. 4B, p Ͻ 0.05) and twice-daily injection for 4 days (Fig. 4D, p Ͻ 0.01) with a trend for reduction with once-daily treatment for 10 days (Fig. 4C, p Ͻ 0.06).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Multiday 0.1 mg/kg nicotine decreased L-DOPA-induced AIMs with an approximately similar pattern across treatment regimens.

    “Multiday 0.1 mg/kg nicotine treatment (Fig. 4, B-D) decreased L-DOPA-induced AIMs, with an approximately similar pattern in the decline in L-DOPA-induced AIMs with the different treatment regimens.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mecamylamine at 1.0 mg/kg was optimal, significantly reducing total, orolingual, and forelimb AIMs and showing a trend toward reduced axial AIMs.

    “Optimal efficacy was observed with the 1.0 mg/kg dose, with a significant reduction in total (P Ͻ 0.05), orolingual (P Ͻ 0.01), and forelimb (P Ͻ 0.05) and a trend for decline in axial AIMs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Combined nicotine and mecamylamine treatment produced an effect similar to either drug alone, and the effect was not additive.

    “Interestingly, the effect of combined treatment with both drugs was similar to that observed with nicotine or mecamylamine on their own (Fig. 6).”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
      “The decline in AIMs with combined nicotine and mecamylamine treatment was not additive, suggesting that nicotine exerts its effects via a nAChR interaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both nicotine and mecamylamine significantly increased α4β2* nAChR binding on the unlesioned side, but not the lesioned side, compared with vehicle-treated controls.

    “Both drugs significantly increased (p Ͻ 0.01) ␣4␤2* binding on the unlesioned, but not lesioned, side compared with vehicle-treated controls.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “The agonist and antagonist also both increased ␣4␤2* nAChRs in the unlesioned, but not lesioned, striatum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    L-DOPA-induced AIMs plateau within 60 minutes after injection and then gradually decline.

    “The time course data in Fig. 4 show that L-DOPA-induced AIMs plateau within 60 min after injection and then gradually decline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nicotine or mecamylamine treatment both decreased α6β2* and increased α4β2* nAChR expression.

    “This latter finding, combined with data showing that mecamylamine reduced AIMs to a similar extent as nicotine, and that nicotine or mecamylamine treatment both decreased ␣6␤2* and increased ␣4␤2* nAChR expression, suggests that the nicotine-mediated improvement in L-DOPA-induced AIMs may involve a desensitization block.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nicotine given intermittently via multiday injection or constantly via minipump for several days both attenuate L-DOPA-induced AIMs in parkinsonian rats.

    “They show that nicotine given intermittently via multiday injection or constantly via minipump for several days both attenuate L-DOPA-induced AIMs in parkinsonian rats, an animal model predictive of the human condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Deep brain stimulation is an alternative management approach for L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias but is a serious surgical intervention with associated risks.

    “An alternate approach for the management of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease involves deep brain stimulation; however, this is a serious surgical intervention with associated risks (Benabid et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Benabid et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Nicotine generally acts in the central nervous system through nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

    “Nicotine generally exerts its effects in the central nervous system (CNS) via an interaction at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) (Albuquerque et al., 2009;Gotti et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Albuquerque et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gotti et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A smaller population of α6β2* nAChRs is restricted to CNS catecholaminergic neurons, including nigrostriatal neurons, and may be involved in reward, addiction, and motor activity.

    “There is also a smaller population of ␣6␤2* nAChRs, which is restricted in localization to CNS catecholaminergic neurons, including those in the nigrostriatal pathway, which may be involved in reward, addiction, and motor activity (Drenan et al., 2008;Pons et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Drenan et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pons et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    At baseline, lesioned rats were randomly divided into two groups with comparable total L-DOPA-induced AIM scores.

    “At the beginning of the study, lesioned rats were randomly divided into two groups such that total L-DOPA-induced AIM scores were comparable in the two sets of animals (62.9 Ϯ 6.6 and 60.5 Ϯ 10.4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The α4β2*, α6β2*, and α7 nAChR subtypes have been implicated in striatal function and influence striatal dopamine release.

    “All three nAChR subtypes (␣4␤2*, ␣6␤2*, and ␣7) have been implicated in striatal function and shown to influence striatal dopamine release (Grady et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grady et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nicotinic regulation of dopamine release likely involves an interplay between receptor activation and desensitization, and desensitization produces an effective channel block similar to that seen with nAChR antagonists.

    “In addition, studies using cyclic voltametry indicate that this regulation of dopamine release most likely represents a complex interplay between nicotinic receptor activation and desensitization (Exley et al., 2008;Meyer et al., 2008;Perez et al., 2008)”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “with the latter resulting in an effective channel block similar to that observed with nAChR antagonists (Corringer et al., 2006;Picciotto et al., 2008;Buccafusco et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Exley et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Meyer et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Perez et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dyskinesias occur in most patients after repeated L-DOPA exposure and can be troublesome or disabling.

    “These excessive abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs), which occur in the majority of patients with repeated exposure to L-DOPA, can be very troublesome and even disabling (Fahn, 2008;Schapira et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fahn, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schapira et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Few drugs are currently available to reduce dyskinesias.

    “Few drugs are currently available to attenuate dyskinesias (Fahn, 2008;Schapira et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fahn, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schapira et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The agonist nicotine and the antagonist mecamylamine both exert antidepressant-like effects.

    “Behavioral studies also show that the agonist nicotine and the antagonist mecamylamine both improve memory-related task performance in rodents and monkeys (Buccafusco and Jackson, 1991;Terry et al., 1999) and exert antidepressant-like effects (Semba et al., 1998;Tizabi et al., 1998;Shytle et al., 2002;Gatto et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Semba et al., 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tizabi et al., 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shytle et al., 2002 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Nicotine exposure may slowly stabilize nAChRs in a high-affinity state that is more easily activated, leading eventually to desensitization.

    “Alternatively, or as well, nicotine exposure may slowly stabilize nAChRs in a high-affinity state that is more easily activated, leading eventually to desensitization (Vallejo et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vallejo et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    α4β2* nAChRs in the striatum are 80% localized postsynaptically on GABAergic neurons where they modulate GABA release and 20% presynaptically on dopaminergic terminals involved in regulating dopamine release.

    “In addition, they are present in the striatum, with 80% localized postsynaptically on GABAergic neurons where they modulate GABA release and 20% presynaptically on dopaminergic terminals that are involved in regulating dopamine release (Grady et al., 2007;Quik et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grady et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Quik et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Nicotine initially activates and then subsequently desensitizes or inactivates nAChRs, with a consequent receptor block.

    “The molecular basis for these seemingly discrepant observations may relate to findings that nicotine initially activates and then subsequently desensitizes or inactivates nAChRs, with a consequent receptor block (Corringer et al., 2006;Picciotto et al., 2008;Buccafusco et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Corringer et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Picciotto et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Buccafusco et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The similarity in changes in α6β2* and α4β2* nAChRs with nicotine and mecamylamine treatment with and without nigrostriatal damage suggests a similarity in mechanism of action, that is, that nicotine induces its effects via a receptor desensitization blockade.

    “The similarity in the changes in ␣6␤2* and ␣4␤2* nAChRs with nicotine and mecamylamine treatment with and without nigrostriatal damage suggests a similarity in mechanism of action, that is, that nicotine induces its effects via a receptor desensitization blockade.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Mecamylamine blocks multiple nAChR subtypes.
    • Rests on an assumption: Minipump administration results in a slow continual release of nicotine that readily promotes receptor desensitization.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The agonist nicotine and the antagonist mecamylamine both improve memory-related task performance in rodents and monkeys.

    “Behavioral studies also show that the agonist nicotine and the antagonist mecamylamine both improve memory-related task performance in rodents and monkeys (Buccafusco and Jackson, 1991;Terry et al., 1999) and exert antidepressant-like effects (Semba et al., 1998;Tizabi et al., 1998;Shytle et al., 2002;Gatto et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buccafusco and Jackson, 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Terry et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cotinine exhibits several nicotinelike properties, including effects on acoustic startle, attention, and neuroprotection.

    “Indeed, studies show that cotinine exhibits several nicotinelike properties, including effects on acoustic startle, attention, and neuroprotection (Buccafusco and Terry, 2003;Buccafusco et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buccafusco and Terry, 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Buccafusco et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cotinine is a primary nicotine metabolite with an extensive half-life (17-18 h).

    “One such compound is cotinine, a primary nicotine metabolite with an extensive half-life (17-18 h) (Matta et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matta et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    α6β2* nAChRs localized to catecholaminergic neurons may also be relevant for the observed effects of nicotine on L-DOPA-induced AIMs.

    “The ␣6␤2* nAChRs localized to catecholaminergic neurons may also be of relevance for the observed effects of nicotine on L-DOPA-induced AIMs (Grady et al., 2007;Quik et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grady et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Quik et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The lack of effect of administered cotinine may be due to insufficient cotinine entry into the brain, with CNS levels too low for efficacy.

    “The lack of effect of administered cotinine in the current study may be caused by insufficient cotinine entry into the brain such that the CNS levels were too low for efficacy (Lockman et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lockman et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cotinine stimulates nAChRs and may have biological effects.

    “The rather high circulating plasma cotinine levels after nicotine ingestion, coupled with findings that cotinine stimulates nAChRs, has prompted the suggestion that cotinine per se may have biological effects (Dwoskin et al., 1999;O'Leary et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dwoskin et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites O'Leary et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Nicotine formulations (patch, gum, lozenge, nasal spray, nasal inhalant) are currently available in humans for smoking cessation.

    “This includes the nicotine patch, gum, lozenge, nasal spray, and nasal inhalant (Matta et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Matta et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Any of these nicotine applications has potential in the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias.

    “Our data would suggest that any one of these applications has potential in the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Nicotine consistently reduced L-DOPA-induced AIMs across species, using several different treatment paradigms.

    “Thus, nicotine consistently reduced L-DOPA-induced AIMs across species, using several different treatment paradigms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mecamylamine acts as a general nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist.

    “Because mecamylamine is a well known nAChR antagonist”
    “mecamylamine is a nonspecific nAChR antagonist that blocks ganglionic nicotinic receptors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The present work is the first to investigate mechanisms of nicotine-mediated decline in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias.

    “The present work is the first to investigate the potential mechanisms of nicotine-mediated decline in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mecamylamine blocks multiple nAChR subtypes.

    “mecamylamine, an antagonist that blocks multiple nAChR subtypes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Minipump administration results in a slow continual release of nicotine that readily promotes receptor desensitization.

    “This latter mode of administration results in a slow continual release of nicotine that readily promotes receptor desensitization.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting timing of nicotine injection before L-DOPA

    Major

    The methods say nicotine was injected 10 minutes before L-DOPA, but the Figure 6 caption says the listed treatments, including nicotine, were followed 30 minutes later by L-DOPA.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bordia, T., Campos, C., McIntosh, J. M., & Quik, M.
Affiliations
SRI International (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
333
Issue
3
Pages
929-938
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096898998
Cited by
82
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH53631, R01MH053631, R29MH053631)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012242, DA12242)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS047162, NS42091, NS47162, R01NS042091)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
levodopa-induced dyskinesia, nicotine, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, receptor desensitization, mecamylamine, abnormal involuntary movements, Parkinson's disease, 6-hydroxydopamine lesion, alpha4beta2 nAChR, cotinine
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Antiparkinson Agents, Autoradiography, Behavior, Animal, Calcium Channel Blockers, Cocaine, Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced, Functional Laterality, Levodopa, Male, Mecamylamine, Nicotine, Pyridines, Receptors, Nicotinic, Stereotyped Behavior, Neostriatum, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nicotinic Agonists, Nicotinic Antagonists, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Conotoxins, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review