CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysGenetic factors in colorectal cancerBRCA gene mutations in cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cancer phenotype correlates with constitutional TP53 genotype in families with the Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Birch, Jillian M, Blair, Valerie, Kelsey, Anna M, Evans, D Gareth, Harris, Martin, Tricker, Karen J, Varley, Jennifer M·1998·Oncogene
DOI 10.1038/sj.onc.1202033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Li-Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome is associated with germline TP53 mutations in the majority of families. We have investigated cancer incidence in 34 Li-Fraumeni families, according to their constitutional TP53 mutation status. Families with germline missense mutations in the core DNA binding domain showed a more highly penetrant cancer phenotype than families with other TP53 mutations or no mutation. Cancer phenotype in families carrying such mutations was characterized by a higher cancer incidence and earlier ages at diagnosis, especially of breast cancer and brain tumours, compared with families carrying protein truncating or other inactivating mutations (P=0.03 for all cancers, P=0.006 for breast cancers, P=0.05 for brain tumours). Proband cancers showed significantly younger ages at diagnosis in those with missense mutations in the DNA binding domain than in those with protein inactivating mutations (P=0.031). In individuals with the former type of mutation, there was a significantly lower proportion of tumours which showed loss of the wild-type TP53 allele (P=0.004). These results are consistent with observations in experimental systems which demonstrate that certain mutations exhibit gain of function and/or dominant-negative properties. Our results support an enhanced oncogenic potential for such mutations in human populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1202033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Birch, J. M., Blair, V., Kelsey, A. M., Evans, D. G., Harris, M., Tricker, K. J., & Varley, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Oncogene
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-09-03
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1061-1068
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
DOI
10.1038/sj.onc.1202033
OpenAlex
W2051611229
Cited by
200
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
Li-Fraumeni syndrome, TP53 mutation, missense mutations, DNA-binding domain, cancer susceptibility, cancer incidence, age at diagnosis, breast cancer, brain tumors, gain-of-function, dominant negative mutation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, DNA Mutational Analysis, Family, Family Health, Female, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pedigree, Phenotype, Cohort Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome, Germ-Line Mutation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review