Cited by 102DNA Repair MechanismsNuclear Structure and FunctionEffects of Radiation Exposure

ATR-dependent checkpoint modulates XPA nuclear import in response to UV irradiation

Open access
Wu, X, Shell, S M, Liu, Y, Zou, Y·2007·Oncogene

Abstract

In response to DNA damage, mammalian cells activate various DNA repair pathways to remove DNA lesions and, meanwhile, halt cell cycle progressions to allow sufficient time for repair. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) and the ATR-dependent cell cycle checkpoint activation are two major cellular responses to DNA damage induced by UV irradiation. However, how these two processes are coordinated in the response is poorly understood. Here we showed that the essential NER factor XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum group A) underwent nuclear accumulation upon UV irradiation, and strikingly, such an event occurred in an ATR (Ataxia-Telangiectasia mutated and RAD3-related)-dependent manner. Either treatment of cells with ATR kinase inhibitors or transfection of cells with small interfering RNA targeting ATR compromised the UV-induced XPA nuclear translocation. Consistently, the ATR-deficient cells displayed no substantial XPA nuclear translocation while the translocation remained intact in ATM (Ataxia-Telangiectasia mutated)-deficient cells in response to UV irradiation. Moreover, we found that ATR is required for the UV-induced nuclear focus formation of XPA. Taken together, our results suggested that the ATR checkpoint pathway may modulate NER activity through the regulation of XPA redistribution in human cells upon UV irradiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1209828

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • XPA localization to the nucleus depends on DNA damage and cell cycle stage.

    “XPA has an N-terminal NLS (Figure 1), but its localization to the nucleus where it functions also depends on DNA damage and cell cycle stage [24], [32], [33].”
  • In unstressed cells, XPA is primarily restricted to the cytoplasm in G1 and S phases, but is present predominantly in the nucleus during G2 phase.

    “However, more recent biochemical fractionation and immunofluorescence studies demonstrate that in unstressed cells XPA is primarily restricted to the cytoplasm of cells in G1 and S phases, though it is present predominately in the nucleus during the G2 phase [24], [25], [31], [32].”
  • There may be two stages of XPA nuclear import: one occurs naturally in the absence of DNA damage, and another massive transport (particularly in S-phase) is initiated by specific DNA damage signaling.

    “These observations indicate that there maybe two stages of XPA nuclear import: one occurs naturally in the absence of DNA damage, and another, the massive transport (particularly in S-phase), is initiated by specific DNA damage signaling [24], [32], [33].”
  • The DNA damage-induced nuclear import of cytoplasmic XPA for NER during S-phase is a DNA damage checkpoint-dependent process mediated by ATR and p53.

    “It was shown previously that the DNA damage-induced nuclear import of cytoplasmic XPA for NER during S-phase is a DNA damage checkpoint-dependent process mediated by ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein and p53 tumor suppressor protein [24], [25], [33].”
  • Efficient nuclear import of XPA may occur as early as 1⁄2 hour post UV-irradiation.

    “This suggests that the efficient nuclear import of XPA may occur as early as ½ hour post UV-irradiation, consistent with our previous report [24].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 102

Authors
Wu, X., Shell, S. M., Liu, Y., & Zou, Y.
Affiliations
East Tennessee State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zou, Y
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2006-07-24
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
757-764
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2083874142
Cited by
102
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R56CA086927, R01CA086927, CA-86927)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
XPA, ATR, nucleotide excision repair, UV irradiation, DNA damage response, cell cycle checkpoints, nuclear translocation, ATM, ATR inhibitors
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Ataxia Telangiectasia, Cell Nucleus, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fibroblasts, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Transfection, Ultraviolet Rays, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Active Transport, Cell Nucleus, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, RNA, Small Interfering, Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review