The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of the neural underpinnings of perception is largely built upon studies employing 2-dimensional (2D) planar images. Here we used slow event-related functional imaging in humans to examine whether neural populations show a characteristic repetition-related change in haemodynamic response for real-world 3-dimensional (3D) objects, an effect commonly observed using 2D images. As expected, trials involving 2D pictures of objects produced robust repetition effects within classic object-selective cortical regions along the ventral and dorsal visual processing streams. Surprisingly, however, repetition effects were weak, if not absent on trials involving the 3D objects. These results suggest that the neural mechanisms involved in processing real objects may therefore be distinct from those that arise when we encounter a 2D representation of the same items. These preliminary results suggest the need for further research with ecologically valid stimuli in other imaging designs to broaden our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying human vision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72999 · Cited by 1,876
Visual field maps in human cortex.
Wandell, B. A., Dumoulin, S. O., & Brewer, A. A. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012 · Cited by 1,231 · cited 1×
“Similar activation was also evident within ‘dorsal stream object areas’, extending from the expected location of anterior V3, dorsally into the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) anterior to the expected location of IPS-”
BackgroundNeural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention
Desimone, R. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494 · Cited by 1,028
A Neural Mechanism for Working and Recognition Memory in Inferior Temporal Cortex
Miller, E. K., Li, L., & Desimone, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1962197 · Cited by 706
Researchers Misunderstand Confidence Intervals and Standard Error Bars.
Belia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J., & Cumming, G. (2005) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.4.389 · Cited by 390
Cited by
‘What’ Is Happening in the Dorsal Visual Pathway
Freud, E., Plaut, D. C., & Behrmann, M. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.003 · Cited by 286
Virtual Reality in Psychological, Medical and Pedagogical Applications
(2012) · doi:10.5772/2607 · Cited by 103
“A study revealed that participants in a VR condition (n= 9) showed significantly greater improvement on CAPS scores than the waitlist control group (n= 8) [79].”
BackgroundInfluentialNeuroimaging for psychotherapy research: current trends.
Weingarten, C. P., & Strauman, T. J. (2015) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2014.883088 · Cited by 81
“For example, brain responses to two-dimensional representations can differ from responses to actual threedimensional objects and this may be true for persons as well (Snow et al., 2011).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Snow, J. C., Pettypiece, C. E., McAdam, T. D., McLean, A. D., Stroman, P. W., Goodale, M. A., & Culham, J. C.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2011-10-26
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-130
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084735865
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep00130
- The paper
- Snow, J. C., Pettypiece, C. E., McAdam, T. D., McLean, A. D., Stroman, P. W., Goodale, M. A., & Culham, J. C. (2011). Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.