The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities
Open accessAbstract
Pervasive infrastructures, such as cell phone networks, enable to capture large amounts of human behavioral data but also provide information about the structure of cities and their dynamical properties. In this article, we focus on these last aspects by studying phone data recorded during 55 days in 31 Spanish cities. We first define an urban dilatation index which measures how the average distance between individuals evolves during the day, allowing us to highlight different types of city structure. We then focus on hotspots, the most crowded places in the city. We propose a parameter free method to detect them and to test the robustness of our results. The number of these hotspots scales sublinearly with the population size, a result in agreement with previous theoretical arguments and measures on employment datasets. We study the lifetime of these hotspots and show in particular that the hierarchy of permanent ones, which constitute the 'heart' of the city, is very stable whatever the size of the city. The spatial structure of these hotspots is also of interest and allows us to distinguish different categories of cities, from monocentric and "segregated" where the spatial distribution is very dependent on land use, to polycentric where the spatial mixing between land uses is much more important. These results point towards the possibility of a new, quantitative classification of cities using high resolution spatio-temporal data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows
Roth, C., Kang, S. M., Batty, M., & Barthélemy, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015923 · Cited by 461
Self-citation
Cited by
Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle
Oliver, N., Lepri, B., Sterly, H., Lambiotte, R., Deletaille, S., De Nadai, M., Letouzé, E., Salah, A. A., Benjamins, R., Cattuto, C., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc0764 · Cited by 631
A survey of results on mobile phone datasets analysis
Blondel, V. D., Decuyper, A., & Krings, G. (2015) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-015-0046-0 · Cited by 647
A multi-source dataset of urban life in the city of Milan and the Province of Trentino
Barlacchi, G., De Nadai, M., Larcher, R., Casella, A., Chitic, C., Torrisi, G., Antonelli, F., Vespignani, A., Pentland, A., & Lepri, B. (2015) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.55 · Cited by 560
The universal visitation law of human mobility
Schläpfer, M., Dong, L., O’Keeffe, K., Santi, P., Szell, M., Salat, H., Anklesaria, S., Vazifeh, M., Ratti, C., & West, G. B. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03480-9 · Cited by 425
Tu, W., Cao, J., Yue, Y., Shaw, S.-L., Zhou, M., Wang, Z., Chang, X., Xu, Y., & Li, Q. (2017) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2017.1356464 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Louail, T., Lenormand, M., Cantu Ros, O. G., Picornell, M., Herranz, R., Frias-Martinez, E., Ramasco, J. J., & Barthelemy, M.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2014-06-13
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5276-5276
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129343844
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 75.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.