The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria
Open accessAbstract
The positive effects of root-colonizing bacteria cooperating with plants lead to improved growth and/or health of their eukaryotic hosts. Some of these Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) display several plant-beneficial properties, suggesting that the accumulation of the corresponding genes could have been selected in these bacteria. Here, this issue was targeted using 23 genes contributing directly or indirectly to established PGPR effects, based on genome sequence analysis of 304 contrasted Alpha- Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria. Most of the 23 genes studied were also found in non-PGPR Proteobacteria and none of them were common to all 25 PGPR genomes studied. However, ancestral character reconstruction indicated that gene transfers -predominantly ancient- resulted in characteristic gene combinations according to taxonomic subgroups of PGPR strains. This suggests that the PGPR-plant cooperation could have established separately in various taxa, yielding PGPR strains that use different gene assortments. The number of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions increased along the continuum -animal pathogens, phytopathogens, saprophytes, endophytes/symbionts, PGPR- indicating that the accumulation of these genes (and possibly of different plant-beneficial traits) might be an intrinsic PGPR feature. This work uncovered preferential associations occurring between certain genes contributing to phytobeneficial traits and provides new insights into the emergence of PGPR bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300004310 · Cited by 5,136
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads
Haas, D., & Défago, G. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1129 · Cited by 2,598
Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., & Elsas, J. D. V. (2008) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008 · Cited by 1,688
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning
Vacheron, J., Desbrosses, G., Bouffaud, M.-L., Touraine, B., Moënne-Loccoz, Y., Muller, D., Legendre, L., Wisniewski-Dyé, F., & Prigent-Combaret, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00356 · Cited by 1,524
Self-citationFRITZ, S. A., & PURVIS, A. (2010) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01455.x · Cited by 1,057
How the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Azospirillum Promotes Plant Growth—A Critical Assessment
Bashan, Y., & de-Bashan, L. E. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)08002-8 · Cited by 953
Modulation of Host Immunity by Beneficial Microbes
Zamioudis, C., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2012) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-06-11-0179 · Cited by 921
Cited by
Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes
Finkel, O. M., Castrillo, G., Herrera Paredes, S., Salas González, I., & Dangl, J. L. (2017) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.018 · Cited by 721
Jenkins, J. R., Viger, M., Arnold, E. C., Harris, Z. M., Ventura, M., Miglietta, F., Girardin, C., Edwards, R. J., Rumpel, C., Fornasier, F., et al. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12371 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruto, M., Prigent-Combaret, C., Muller, D., & Moënne-Loccoz, Y.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2014-09-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6261-6261
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984827043
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep06261
- The paper
- Bruto, M., Prigent-Combaret, C., Muller, D., & Moënne-Loccoz, Y. (2014). Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.