Cited by 184Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Biochar alters the soil microbiome and soil function: results of next-generation amplicon sequencing across Europe

Open access
Jenkins, Joseph R., Viger, Maud, Arnold, Elizabeth C., Harris, Zoe M., Ventura, Maurizio, Miglietta, Franco, Girardin, Cyril, Edwards, Richard J. +6 more·2017·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Wide‐scale application of biochar to soil has been suggested as a mechanism to offset increases in CO2 emissions through the long‐term sequestration of a carbon rich and inert substance to the soil, but the implications of this for soil diversity and function remain to be determined. Biochar is capable of inducing changes in soil bacterial communities, but the exact impacts of its application are poorly understood. Using three European sites [UK SRC, short rotation coppice, French grassland (FR) and Italian SRF, short rotation forestry (IT)] treated with identical biochar applications, we undertook 16S and ITS amplicon DNA sequencing. In addition, we carried out assessments of community change over time and N and P mobilization in the UK. Significant changes in bacterial and community structure occurred due to treatment, although the nature of the changes varied by site.STAMP differential abundance analysis showed enrichment of Gemmatimonadete and Acidobacteria in UK biochar plots 1 year after application, whilst control plots exhibited enriched Gemmataceae, Isosphaeraceae and Koribacteraceae. Increased mobility of ammonium and phosphates was also detected after 1 year, coupled with a shift from acid to alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity, which may suggest an ecological and functional shift towards a more copiotrophic ecology. Italy also exhibited enrichments, in both the Proteobacteria(driven by an increase in the order Rhizobiales) and the Gemmatimonadetes. No significant change in the abundance of individual taxa was noted in FR, although a small significant change in unweighted UNIFRAC occurred, indicating variation in the identities of taxa present due to treatment. Fungal β diversity was affected by treatment in IT and FR, but was unaffected in UK samples. The effects of time and site were greater than that of biochar application in UK samples. Overall, this report gives a tantalizing view of the soil microbiome at several sites across Europe and suggests that although application of biochar has significant effects on microbial communities, these may be small compared with the highly variable soil microbiome that is found in different soils and changes with time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12371

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenkins, J. R., Viger, M., Arnold, E. C., Harris, Z. M., Ventura, M., Miglietta, F., Girardin, C., Edwards, R. J., Rumpel, C., Fornasier, F., Zavalloni, C., Tonon, G., Alberti, G., & Taylor, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
  • Fondazione Edmund Mach (IT)
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Ecosys UMR INRA‐AgroParisTECH Bâtiment EGER Aile B 78820 Thiverval‐Grignon France
  • Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Gail
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
591-612
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2408991519
Cited by
184
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
21.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (262060, 265179)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H010742/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013200/1)
  • University of Southampton
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
biochar, soil microbiome, soil bacterial communities, soil fungal diversity, soil carbon sequestration, nitrogen mobilization, phosphorus mobilization, phosphomonoesterase activity, Gemmatimonadetes, Acidobacteria, Rhizobiales, short rotation coppice, short rotation forestry, grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review