Cited by 24Corneal surgery and disordersOptical measurement and interference techniquesOptical Coherence Tomography Applications

Imaging shear stress distribution and evaluating the stress concentration factor of the human eye

Open access
Joseph Antony, S.·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Healthy eyes are vital for a better quality of human life. Historically, for man-made materials, scientists and engineers use stress concentration factors to characterise the effects of structural non-homogeneities on their mechanical strength. However, such information is scarce for the human eye. Here we present the shear stress distribution profiles of a healthy human cornea surface in vivo using photo-stress analysis tomography, which is a non-intrusive and non-X-ray based method. The corneal birefringent retardation measured here is comparable to that of previous studies. Using this, we derive eye stress concentration factors and the directional alignment of major principal stress on the surface of the cornea. Similar to thermometers being used for monitoring the general health in humans, this report provides a foundation to characterise the shear stress carrying capacity of the cornea and a potential bench mark for validating theoretical modelling of stresses in the human eye in future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep08899

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The arrangement of these putative structures seems to correspond with the shear stress distribution in the peripheral cornea.

    “The arrangement of these putative structures seem to correspond with the sheer stress distribution in the peripheral cornea (Antony, 2015).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Antony, 2015

    The Results and Discussion report that the measured shear-stress profile correlates with the diamond-like structural architecture of the cornea. The paper describes this correlation for the cornea generally, not specifically for the peripheral cornea, so the location in the citing sentence is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Shigley S. E., Mischke C. R. & Budynas R. Mechanical Engineering Design. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004).
  2. Lancaster J. F. Engineering catastrophes: causes and effects of major accidents. (Abington Publishing, Cambridge, 2000).
  3. Dally J. W. & Riley W. F. Experimental Stress Analysis. (McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1978).
  4. Fernandes C. P., Glantz P. J., Svensson S. A. & Bergmark A. Reflection photoelasticity: a new method for studies of clinical mechanics in prosthetic dentistry. Dent. Mater. 19, 106– 117 (2003). 12543116
  5. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv. Opthalmol. 52, S109– S114 (2007). 17998034
  6. Timoshenko S. P. & Goodier J. N. Theory of elasticity. (McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1982).
  7. Bour L. & Cardozo N. On the birefringence of the living human eye. Vis. Res. 21, 1413– 1421 (1981). 7314525
  8. Carney L., Mainstone J. & Henderson B. Corneal Topography and Myopia: A cross-sectional study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38, 311– 320 (1997). 9040463
  9. Bueno J. M. Measurement of parameters of polarization in the living human eye using imaging polarimetry. Vis. Res. 40, 3791– 3799 (2000). 11090671
  10. Götzinger E., Pircher M., Sticker M., Fercher A. & Hitzenberger C. Measurement and imaging of birefringent properties of the human cornea with phase-resolved polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Jl. Biomed. Opt. 9, 94– 102 (2004). 14715060
  11. Meek K. M. & Boote C. The use of X-ray scattering techniques to quantify the orientation and distribution of collagen in the corneal stroma. Prog. Reti. Eye Res. 28, 369– 392 (2009). 19577657
  12. VanNasdale D., Elsner A., Hobbs T. & Burns S. Foveal phase retardation changes associated with normal aging. Vis. Res. 51, 2263– 2272 (2011). 21893077 PMC3319026
  13. Götzinger E. et al. Imaging of birefringent properties of keratoconus corneas by polarization-sensitive optical Coherence Tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 3551– 3558 (2007). 17652723
  14. Boote C., Dennis S., Huang Y., Quantock A. & Meek K. M. Lamellar orientation in human cornea in relation to mechanical properties. Jl. Struc. Biol. 149, 1– 6 (2005). 15629652
  15. Asejczyk-Widlicka M., Śródka D. W., Kasprzak H. & Pierscionek B. K. Modelling the elastic properties of the anterior eye and their contribution to maintenance of image quality: the role of the limbus. Eye 21, 1087– 1094 (2007). 16823462
  16. Burd H. J., Wilde G. S. & Judge S. J. Can reliable values of Young's modulus be deduced from Fisher's (1971) spinning lens measurements? Vis. Res. 46, 1346– 1360 (2006). 16125748
  17. Burd H. J. A structural constitutive model for the human lens capsule. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 8, 217– 231 (2009). 18622755
  18. Śródka W. Evaluating the material parameters of the human cornea in a numerical model. Acta. Bioeng. Biomech. 13, 77– 85 (2011). 22098299
  19. Lesniak J. R., Zickel M. J., Welch C. S. & Johnson D. F. An innovative polariscope for photoelastic stress analysis. Proc. SEM Spring conf. Exp. Mech., Bellevue, USA, 219– 224 (1997).
  20. Misson G. P. Circular polarization biomicroscopy: a method for determining human corneal stromal lamellar organization in vivo. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 27, 256– 264 (2007). 17470238
  21. Pierscionek B. K. & Weale R. A. Investigation of the polarization optics of the living human cornea and lens with Purkinje images. Appl. Opt. 37, 6845– 6851(1998). 18301501
  22. Pierscionek B. K. & Weale R. A. Is there a link between corneal structure and the ‘corneal cross’? Eye 11, 361– 364 (1997). 9373477
  23. Yamamoto Y., Uno T., Joko T., Shiraishi A. & Ohashi Y. Effect of anterior chamber depth on shear stress exerted on corneal endothelial cells by altered aqueous flow after laser iridotomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 1956– 1964 (2010). 19907022
  24. Le X. & Le Z. Stress concentration factors due to typical geometric discontinuities for shaft design by numerical simulation. Proc. 120th ASEE conf. Expos., Atlanta, USA, Paper No. 6755 (2013).
  25. Maurice D. M. Some puzzles in the microscopic structure of the stroma. J Refract. Surg. 15, 692– 694 (1999). 10590011
  26. Jhanji V., Yang B., Yu M., Ye C. & Leung C. Corneal thickness and elevation measurements using swept-source optical coherence tomography and slit scanning topography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Clini. Exp. Ophth. 41, 735– 745 (2013). 23566209
  27. Last J., Thomasy S., Croasdale C., Russell P. & Murphy C. Compliance profile of the human cornea as measured by atomic force microscopy. Micron. 43, 1293– 1298 (2012). 22421334 PMC3622051
  28. Meek K. M. & Fullwood N. J. Corneal and scleral collagens-a microscopist's perspective. Micron. 32, 261– 272 (2001). 11006506

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joseph Antony, S.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
8899-8899
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136113643
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Warwick
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
Keywords
shear stress distribution, stress concentration factor, human cornea, corneal birefringence, ocular biomechanics, in vivo corneal imaging, non-invasive stress measurement
MeSH terms
Cornea, Diagnostic Imaging, Eye, Humans, Microscopy, Polarization, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Shear Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review