The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Populus in the First Generation
Open accessAbstract
Recently, RNA-guided genome editing using the type II clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas) system has been applied to edit the plant genome in several herbaceous plant species. However, it remains unknown whether this system can be used for genome editing in woody plants. In this study, we describe the genome editing and targeted gene mutation in a woody species, Populus tomentosa Carr. via the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Four guide RNAs (gRNAs) were designed to target with distinct poplar genomic sites of the phytoene desaturase gene 8 (PtoPDS) which are followed by the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). After Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, obvious albino phenotype was observed in transgenic poplar plants. By analyzing the RNA-guided genome-editing events, 30 out of 59 PCR clones were homozygous mutants, 2 out of 59 were heterozygous mutants and the mutation efficiency at these target sites was estimated to be 51.7%. Our data demonstrate that the Cas9/sgRNA system can be exploited to precisely edit genomic sequence and effectively create knockout mutations in woody plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062
Cited by
Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants
Osakabe, Y., Watanabe, T., Sugano, S. S., Ueta, R., Ishihara, R., Shinozaki, K., & Osakabe, K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26685 · Cited by 367
CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation
Wang, X., Tu, M., Wang, D., Liu, J., Li, Y., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12832 · Cited by 367
Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System
Arora, L., & Narula, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01932 · Cited by 367
Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding
Xu, Y., Li, P., Zou, C., Lu, Y., Xie, C., Zhang, X., Prasanna, B. M., & Olsen, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx135 · Cited by 336
Genome editing in cotton with the CRISPR/cas9 system
Gao, W., Long, L., Tian, X., Xu, F., Liu, J., Singh, P. K., Botella, J. R., & Song, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01364 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, D., Liu, T., Li, C., Jiao, B., Li, S., Hou, Y., & Luo, K.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-07-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12217-12217
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W994421439
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Populus in the First Generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep12217
- The paper
- Fan, D., Liu, T., Li, C., Jiao, B., Li, S., Hou, Y., & Luo, K. (2015). Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Populus in the First Generation. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.