Cited by 40Surface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

Bioinspired superhydrophobic surfaces, fabricated through simple and scalable roll-to-roll processing

Open access
Park, Sung-Hoon, Lee, Sangeui, Moreira, David, Bandaru, Prabhakar R., Han, InTaek, Yun, Dong-Jin·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

A simple, scalable, non-lithographic, technique for fabricating durable superhydrophobic (SH) surfaces, based on the fingering instabilities associated with non-Newtonian flow and shear tearing, has been developed. The high viscosity of the nanotube/elastomer paste has been exploited for the fabrication. The fabricated SH surfaces had the appearance of bristled shark skin and were robust with respect to mechanical forces. While flow instability is regarded as adverse to roll-coating processes for fabricating uniform films, we especially use the effect to create the SH surface. Along with their durability and self-cleaning capabilities, we have demonstrated drag reduction effects of the fabricated films through dynamic flow measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep15430

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Super-hydrophobic polymer surfaces with water contact angles above 150°, low surface energy, and self-cleaning properties resist microbial cell adhesion in short-term applications.

    “Super-hydrophobic polymer surfaces, such as very smooth silicone, polyurethane, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), and polyethylene (PE), that have water contact angles larger than 150°, low surface energy,55,56 as well as unique water repellent57 and self-cleaning abilities,56 are known to have resistance to microbial cell adhesion during short-term applications.58”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, S.-H., Lee, S., Moreira, D., Bandaru, P. R., Han, I., & Yun, D.-J.
Affiliations
  • Soongsil University (KR)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Samsung (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Park, Sung-Hoon
  • Yun, Dong-Jin
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-10-22
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
15430-15430
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1856715997
Cited by
40
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
superhydrophobic surfaces, roll-to-roll processing, fingering instability, non-Newtonian flow, self-cleaning surfaces, drag reduction, non-lithographic fabrication, surface durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review