The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of tomato wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum to the volatile organic compounds produced by a biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR-9
Open accessAbstract
It is important to study the response of plant pathogens to the antibiosis traits of biocontrol microbes to design the efficient biocontrol strategies. In this study, we evaluated the role of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by a biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR-9 on the growth and virulence traits of tomato wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum (RS). The VOCs of SQR-9 significantly inhibited the growth of RS on agar medium and in soil. In addition, the VOCs significantly inhibited the motility traits, production of antioxidant enzymes and exopolysaccharides, biofilm formation and tomato root colonization by RS. The strain SQR-9 produced 22 VOCs, but only nine VOCs showed 1–11% antibacterial activity against RS in their corresponding amounts; however, the consortium of all VOCs showed 70% growth inhibition of RS. The proteomics analysis showed that the VOCs of SQR-9 downregulated RS proteins related to the antioxidant activity, virulence, carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism, protein folding and translation, while the proteins involved in the ABC transporter system, amino acid synthesis, detoxification of aldehydes and ketones, methylation, protein translation and folding, and energy transfer were upregulated. This study describes the significance and effectiveness of VOCs produced by a biocontrol strain against tomato wilt pathogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269
Cited by
Overview of the Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Members of the Bacillus subtilis Group
Caulier, S., Nannan, C., Gillis, A., Licciardi, F., Bragard, C., & Mahillon, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00302 · Cited by 817
Bacillus velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes
Rabbee, M. F., Ali, M. S., Choi, J., Hwang, B. S., Jeong, S. C., & Baek, K.-H. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24061046 · Cited by 550
Microbial Volatiles: Small Molecules with an Important Role in Intra- and Inter-Kingdom Interactions
Schulz-Bohm, K., Martín-Sánchez, L., & Garbeva, P. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02484 · Cited by 448
Cai, L., Chen, J., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Yang, H., & Ding, W. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00790 · Cited by 365
Biocontrol of Postharvest Fruit Fungal Diseases by Bacterial Antagonists: A Review
Carmona-Hernandez, S., Reyes-Pérez, J., Chiquito-Contreras, R., Rincon-Enriquez, G., Cerdan-Cabrera, C., & Hernandez-Montiel, L. (2019) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy9030121 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Raza, W., Ling, N., Yang, L., Huang, Q., & Shen, Q.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-04-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24856-24856
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2336290590
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of tomato wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum to the volatile organic compounds produced by a biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR-9. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep24856
- The paper
- Raza, W., Ling, N., Yang, L., Huang, Q., & Shen, Q. (2016). Response of tomato wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum to the volatile organic compounds produced by a biocontrol strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR-9. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.