An automated tuberculosis screening strategy combining X-ray-based computer-aided detection and clinical information
Open accessAbstract
Lack of human resources and radiological interpretation expertise impair tuberculosis (TB) screening programmes in TB-endemic countries. Computer-aided detection (CAD) constitutes a viable alternative for chest radiograph (CXR) reading. However, no automated techniques that exploit the additional clinical information typically available during screening exist. To address this issue and optimally exploit this information, a machine learning-based combination framework is introduced. We have evaluated this framework on a database containing 392 patient records from suspected TB subjects prospectively recruited in Cape Town, South Africa. Each record comprised a CAD score, automatically computed from a CXR and 12 clinical features. Comparisons with strategies relying on either CAD scores or clinical information alone were performed. Our results indicate that the combination framework outperforms the individual strategies in terms of the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (0.84 versus 0.78 and 0.72), specificity at 95% sensitivity (49% versus 24% and 31%) and negative predictive value (98% versus 95% and 96%). Thus, it is believed that combining CAD and clinical information to estimate the risk of active disease is a promising tool for TB screening.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of studies reporting on CAD threshold determination only included individuals who met criteria for microbiological testing.
“The majority of studies reporting on CAD threshold determination only included individuals who met some criteria for microbiological testing, such as having symptoms and/or abnormal chest radiographs [8, 16–27].”
From Computer-aided detection thresholds for digital chest radiography interpretation in tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms. (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- World Health Organization. Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: principles and recommendations. (2013). 25996015
- van’t Hoog A. H. et al. A systematic review of the sensitivity and specificity of symptom- and chest-radiography screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative persons and persons with unknown HIV status. (2013). PMC9109771 35320584
- Corbett E. L. & MacPherson P. Tuberculosis screening in high human immunodeficiency virus prevalence settings: turning promise into reality. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis. 17, 1125– 1138 (2013). 23928165 PMC3966511
- van’t Hoog A. H. et al. High sensitivity of chest radiograph reading by clinical officers in a tuberculosis prevalence survey. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis. 15, 1308– 1314 (2011). 22283886
- Maduskar P. et al. Detection of tuberculosis with digital chest radiography: automatic reading versus interpretation by clinical officers. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis. 17, 1613– 1620 (2013). 24200278
- Breuninger M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in chest radiographs: a validation study from sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One 9, e106381 (2014). 25192172 PMC4156349
- Muyoyeta M. et al. The sensitivity and specificity of using a computer aided diagnosis program for automatically scoring chest X-rays of presumptive TB patients compared with Xpert MTB/RIF in Lusaka Zambia. PLoS One 9, e93757 (2014). 24705629 PMC3976315
- van’t Hoog A. H. et al. Screening strategies for tuberculosis prevalence surveys: the value of chest radiography and symptoms. PLoS One 7, e38691 (2012). 22792158 PMC3391193
- Theron G. et al. Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 383, 424– 435 (2014). 24176144
- van Ginneken B. et al. Automated scoring of chest radiographs for tuberculosis prevalence surveys: a combined approach. In: Fifth International Workshop on Pulmonary Image Analysis 9– 19 (2013).
- Wejse C. et al. TBscore: signs and symptoms from tuberculosis patients in a low-resource setting have predictive value and may be used to assess clinical course. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 40, 111– 120 (2008). 17852907
- Peng H., Long F. & Ding C. Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 1226– 1238 (2005). 16119262
- Jain A. K., Duin R. P. W. & Mao J. Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22, 4– 37 (2000).
- Kittler J., Hatef M., Duin R. P. W. & Matas J. On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 226– 239 (1998).
- Warren R. M. & Duffy S. W. Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. Br. J. Radiol. 68, 958– 962 (1995). 7496693
- Wormanns D., Ludwig K., Beyer F., Heindel W. & Diederich S. Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur. Radiol. 15, 14– 22 (2005). 15526207
- Rutter C. M. Bootstrap estimation of diagnostic accuracy with patient-clustered data. Acad. Radiol. 7, 413– 419 (2000). 10845400
- Samuelson F., Petrick N. & Paquerault S. Advantages and examples of resampling for CAD evaluation. In: Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 492– 495 (2007).
- den Boon S. et al. An evaluation of symptom and chest radiographic screening in tuberculosis prevalence surveys. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis. 10, 876– 882 (2006). 16898372
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lakhani, P., & Sundaram, B. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162326 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Peiffer-Smadja, N., Rawson, T. M., Ahmad, R., Buchard, A., Georgiou, P., Lescure, F.-X., Birgand, G., & Holmes, A. H. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.009 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Hwang, E. J., Park, S., Jin, K.-N., Kim, J. I., Choi, S. Y., Lee, J. H., Goo, J. M., Aum, J., Yim, J.-J., Park, C. M., et al. (2019) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy967 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Rajpurkar, P., O’Connell, C., Schechter, A., Asnani, N., Li, J., Kiani, A., Ball, R. L., Mendelson, M., Maartens, G., van Hoving, D. J., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00322-2 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Vanobberghen, F., Keter, A. K., Jacobs, B. K. M., Glass, T. R., Lynen, L., Law, I., Murphy, K., van Ginneken, B., Ayakaka, I., van Heerden, A., et al. (2024) · ERJ Open Research · doi:10.1183/23120541.00508-2023 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Melendez, J., Sánchez, C. I., Philipsen, R. H. H. M., Maduskar, P., Dawson, R., Theron, G., Dheda, K., & van Ginneken, B.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Melendez, Jaime
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-04-29
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25265-25265
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4850474
- OpenAlex
- W2342469653
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (IP2009.32040.009)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- tuberculosis screening, computer-aided detection, chest radiograph, clinical data, radiographic interpretation, South Africa
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Automation, Humans, Mass Screening, Prospective Studies, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, South Africa, Radiography, Thoracic, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review