Cited by 206Climate variability and modelsEcosystem dynamics and resilienceMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

A deforestation-induced tipping point for the South American monsoon system

Open access
Boers, Niklas, Marwan, Norbert, Barbosa, Henrique M. J., Kurths, Jürgen·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The Amazon rainforest has been proposed as a tipping element of the earth system, with the possibility of a dieback of the entire ecosystem due to deforestation only of parts of the rainforest. Possible physical mechanisms behind such a transition are still subject to ongoing debates. Here, we use a specifically designed model to analyse the nonlinear couplings between the Amazon rainforest and the atmospheric moisture transport from the Atlantic to the South American continent. These couplings are associated with a westward cascade of precipitation and evapotranspiration across the Amazon. We investigate impacts of deforestation on the South American monsoonal circulation with particular focus on a previously neglected positive feedback related to condensational latent heating over the rainforest, which strongly enhances atmospheric moisture inflow from the Atlantic. Our results indicate the existence of a tipping point. In our model setup, crossing the tipping point causes precipitation reductions of up to 40% in non-deforested parts of the western Amazon and regions further downstream. The responsible mechanism is the breakdown of the aforementioned feedback, which occurs when deforestation reduces transpiration to a point where the available atmospheric moisture does not suffice anymore to release the latent heat needed to maintain the feedback.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep41489

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Amazon, atmospheric moisture flow westward is an important source of connectivity enhancing forest resilience, partly maintained by forest evapotranspiration.

    “In the Amazon, an important source of connectivity enhancing forest resilience is atmospheric moisture flow westward (Fig. 2), partly maintained by forest evapotranspiration4,37,67.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

  • Another study using a climate-vegetation model found that with accumulated deforestation of 30−50%, rainfall in non-deforested areas downwind would decline by 40%, potentially causing more forest loss.

    “Another study using a climate-vegetation model found that with accumulated deforestation of 30−50%, rainfall in non-deforested areas downwind would decline67 by 40% (ref. 67), potentially causing more forest loss4,37.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bonan G. B. Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests. Science 320, 1444– 9 (2008). 18556546
  2. Davidson E. A.. The Amazon basin in transition. Nature 481, 321– 328 (2012). 22258611
  3. Malhi Y.. Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 20610– 20615 (2009). PMC2791614 19218454
  4. Nobre C. A., Sellers P. J. & Shukla J. Amazonian Deforestation and Regional Climate Change. Journal of Climate 4, 957– 988 (1991).
  5. Gedney N. & Valdes P. J. The effect of Amazonian deforestation on the northern hemisphere circulation and climate. Geophysical Research Letters 27, 3053– 3056 (2000).
  6. Sampaio G.. Regional climate change over eastern Amazonia caused by pasture and soybean cropland expansion. Geophysical Research Letters 34, L17709 (2007).
  7. Harper A.. Impact of evapotranspiration on dry season climate in the Amazon forest. Journal of Climate 574– 591 (2013).
  8. Devaraju N., Bala G. & Modak A. Effects of large-scale deforestation on precipitation in the monsoon regions: Remote versus local effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 201423439 (2015). PMC4371945 25733889
  9. Hoskins B. & Rodwell M. A model of the Asian summer monsoon. Part I: The global scale. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 52, 1329– 1340 (1995).
  10. Jin F. & Hoskins B. The direct response to tropical heating in a baroclinic atmosphere. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 52, 307– 319 (1995).
  11. Rodwell M. J. & Hoskins B. J. Subtropical anticyclones and summer monsoons. Journal of Climate 14, 3192– 3211 (2001).
  12. Vera C.. Toward a unified view of the American monsoon systems. Journal of Climate 19, 4977– 5000 (2006).
  13. Lettau H., Lettau K. & Molion L. C. B. Amazonia’s Hydrologic Cycle and the Role of Atmospheric Recycling in Assessing Deforestation Effects. Monthly Weather Review 107, 227– 238 (1979).
  14. Pires G. F. & Costa M. H. Deforestation causes different subregional effects on the Amazon bioclimatic equilibrium. Geophysical Research Letters 40, 3618– 3623 (2013).
  15. Ghil M. & Robertson A. W. Solving problems with GCMs: General circulation models and their role in the climate modeling hierarchy. In Randall D. A. (ed.) Circulation Model Development vol. 70 of International Geophysics, 285– 325 (Academic Press, 2001).
  16. Good P., Jones C., Lowe J., Betts R. & Gedney N. Comparing tropical forest projections from two generations of hadley centre earth system models, HadGEM2-ES and HadCM3LC. Journal of Climate 26, 495– 511 (2013).
  17. Eltahir E. A. B. Role of vegetation in sustaining large-scale atmospheric circulations in the tropics. Journal of Geophysical Research 101, 4255 (1996).
  18. Zeng N. & Neelin J. D. A land-atmosphere interaction theory for the tropical deforestation problem. Journal of Climate 12, 857– 872 (1999).
  19. Dee D. P.. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 137, 553– 597 (2011).
  20. Soares-Filho B. S.. Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440, 520– 3 (2006). 16554817
  21. Lewis S. L., Brando P. M., Phillips O. L., van der Heijden G. M. F. & Nepstad D. The 2010 Amazon drought. Science 331, 554 (2011). 21292971
  22. Seth A., Fernandes K. & Camargo S. J. Two summers of São Paulo drought: Origins in the western tropical Pacific. Geophysical Research Letters 42, 10816– 10823 (2015).
  23. Neelin J. D., Peters O., Lin J. W.-B., Hales K. & Holloway C. E. Rethinking convective quasi-equilibrium: observational constraints for stochastic convective schemes in climate models. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences 366, 2581– 2604 (2008). 18463055
  24. Spracklen D. V. & Garcia-Carreras L. The impact of Amazonian deforestation on Amazon basin rainfall. Geophysical Research Letters 42, 9546– 9552 (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boers, N., Marwan, N., Barbosa, H. M. J., & Kurths, J.
Affiliations
  • École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Boers, Niklas
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-01-25
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
41489-41489
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2579987443
Cited by
206
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RENATE (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) (cc-by)
  • RENATE (cc-by)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (IRTG 1740/TRP 2011/50151-0, 1740/TRP 2011/50151-0, IRTG1740, TRP 2011/50151-0, Project 13)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (13/50510-5, 11/50151-0, 2011/)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (IRTG 1740, 2012-4)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
Amazon rainforest, deforestation, tipping points, South American monsoon, moisture transport, latent heat release, transpiration, precipitation reduction, nonlinear feedback, Western Amazon
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Conservation of Natural Resources, Models, Theoretical, Rain, Seasons, South America, Tropical Climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review