The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials
Abstract
The Standards, Measurements and Testing Programme (formerly BCR) of the European Commission proposed a three-step sequential extraction procedure for sediment analysis, following extensive expert consultations and two interlaboratory studies. This scheme was recently used to certify the extractable trace element contents of a sediment reference material (CRM 601). Although this procedure offers a means to ensure the comparability of data in this field, some difficulties concerning the interlaboratory reproducibility still remain, and a new project is currently being conducted to determine the causes of poor reproducibility in the extraction scheme. The final objective of the project is the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials for their extractable contents of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn. This paper presents the results of a small-scale interlaboratory study, which aimed to test a revised version of the extraction schemes by comparing the original and the modified protocols using the CRM 601 sample. This work offers an improvement to the BCR sequential extraction procedure through intercomparison exercises. This improved procedure will allow the obtaining of CRMs to validate analytical data in the analysis of soils and sediments, and it will also facilitate comparability of data in the European Union.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Cited by
Gleyzes, C., Tellier, S., & Astruc, M. (2002) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0165-9936(02)00603-9 · Cited by 950
Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction?
Bacon, J. R., & Davidson, C. M. (2008) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b711896a · Cited by 649
Self-citationRao, C. R. M., Sahuquillo, A., & Lopez Sanchez, J. F. (2008) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9564-0 · Cited by 538
Self-citationHuang, H.-J., & Yuan, X.-Z. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.099 · Cited by 398
Xu, D.-M., Fu, R.-B., Wang, J.-X., Shi, Y.-X., & Guo, X.-P. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128730 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Rauret, G., López-Sánchez, J. F., Sahuquillo, A., Rubio, R., Davidson, C., Ure, A., & Quevauviller, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Monitoring
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-61
- ISSN
- 1464-0325 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0333
- OpenAlex
- W1964279456
- Cited by
- 2,419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/a807854h
- The paper
- Rauret, G., López-Sánchez, J. F., Sahuquillo, A., Rubio, R., Davidson, C., Ure, A., & Quevauviller, P. (1999). Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1039/a807854h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
