The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New British Standards
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Suen, N.-T., Hung, S.-F., Quan, Q., Zhang, N., Xu, Y.-J., & Chen, H. M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00328a · Cited by 6,307
Scientific Challenges for the Implementation of Zn-Ion Batteries
Blanc, L. E., Kundu, D., & Nazar, L. F. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.002 · Cited by 2,113
Metal dichalcogenide nanosheets: preparation, properties and applications
Huang, X., Zeng, Z., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35387c · Cited by 2,030
Progress in Flow Battery Research and Development
Skyllas-Kazacos, M., Chakrabarti, M. H., Hajimolana, S. A., Mjalli, F. S., & Saleem, M. (2011) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.3599565 · Cited by 1,453
Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Metadata
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Analytical Division of the Chemical Society
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 143
- ISSN
- 0306-1396 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2674120478
- Cited by
- 904
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New British Standards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/ad9791600143
- The paper
- New British Standards. (1979). Proceedings of the Analytical Division of the Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1039/ad9791600143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
