Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Is my calibration linear?

·1994·The Analyst

Abstract

Testing for the linearity of the calibration is an important feature in the development of an analytical method. The correlation coefficient is often used in this context but is open to misinterpretation by the unwary and is to be discouraged. When data are collected in well designed calibration experiments, tests for non-linearity can be based on the analysis of the residual variance from a regression into parts owing to ‘lack-of-fit’ and ‘pure error’. The calculations can be executed by means of a few simple commands in many statistical software packages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/an9941902363

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Venue
The Analyst
Published
1994
Volume
119
Issue
11
Pages
2363
ISSN
  • 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5528
OpenAlex
W4243382024
Cited by
288
References
0
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is my calibration linear? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/an9941902363
The paper
Is my calibration linear? (1994). The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9941902363

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.