The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part I. Arsenic species in drinking water and urine of the affected people
Abstract
Arsenic in ground water has been found above the maximum permissible limit in six districts of West Bengal covering an area of 34 000 km2 with a population of 30 million. At present 37 blocks of these six districts by the side of the River Ganga are affected and about 800 000 people from 312 villages/wards are drinking arsenic contaminated water and amongst them at least 175 000 people are showing arsenical skin lesions. The source of arsenic is geological. We have analysed thousands of tube-well water samples from these six districts for four arsenic species namely, arsenite, arsenate, monomethylarsonic acid (MMAA) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMAA). We could detect no MMAA or DMAA in any of these samples. In urine, DMAA and MMAA are the predominant species along with arsenite and arsenate. The techniques we used for the determination and speciation of arsenic are: (i) separation of arsenite and arsenate from water by sodium diethyldithiocarbamate in chloroform followed by FI-HGAAS; (ii) spectrophotometry using Ag–DDTC in chloroform with hexamethylenetetramine as absorbing solution; (iii) ion-exchange separation of arsenite and arsenate from water followed by FI-HGAAS; and (iv) for analysis of inorganic arsenic and its metabolites in urine, FI-HGAAS was used after separation of the species by a combined cation–anion-exchange column. Total arsenic in urine was determined by FI-HGAAS after acid decomposition. The most toxic species, arsenite, is present in ground water at about 50% of the total arsenic level, and more than 90% of the total arsenic in urine is inorganic arsenic and its metabolites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment
Ali, I. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300133d · Cited by 1,758
Arsenic in the geosphere — a review
Matschullat, J. (2000) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00524-0 · Cited by 891
McArthur, J. M., Banerjee, D. M., Hudson-Edwards, K. A., Mishra, R., Purohit, R., Ravenscroft, P., Cronin, A., Howarth, R. J., Chatterjee, A., Talukder, T., et al. (2004) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.02.001 · Cited by 831
Self-citationBhattacharya, P., Chatterjee, D., & Jacks, G. (1997) · International Journal of Water Resources Development · doi:10.1080/07900629749944 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatterjee, A., Das, D., Mandal, B. K., Chowdhury, T. R., Samanta, G., & Chakraborti, D.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 643
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2028785038
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part I. Arsenic species in drinking water and urine of the affected people. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/an9952000643
- The paper
- Chatterjee, A., Das, D., Mandal, B. K., Chowdhury, T. R., Samanta, G., & Chakraborti, D. (1995). Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part I. Arsenic species in drinking water and urine of the affected people. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9952000643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.