The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hf isotope ratio analysis using multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: an evaluation of isobaric interference corrections
Abstract
From measurements of Hf–Yb mixtures, we have found that the correction of isobaric interferences involving accepted Yb isotope ratios and reasonable estimates of mass bias result in a significantly under-corrected 176Hf, which is proportional to the amount of Yb added. This can be explained by (1) a significant difference in the instrumental mass bias between Hf and Yb, and (2) that the accepted values for isotopic ratios within the Yb and/or Hf systems are incorrect. We have evaluated these possibilities by measuring mixed solutions of Yb and Hf on two MC-ICP-MS instruments and undertaking a series of REE fractionation experiments using a thermal ionisation mass spectrometer (TIMS). Our results indicate that the presently accepted abundances of the Yb isotopes are not appropriate. We present new values for Yb isotopic abundances based on the TIMS and MC-ICP-MS results. Using the newly defined Yb values, we demonstrate that Yb and Hf have similar levels of mass bias in plasma ionisation instruments, and that Hf isotope ratios can be used to correct Yb mass bias before subsequent correction of isobaric interference. A laser ablation comparison of Yb and Hf indicates that similar relationships exist, and can be applied to micro-analytical techniques where chemical separation is not possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holliger, P., & Devillers, C. (1981) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(81)90209-0 · Cited by 62
Cited by
Vervoort, J. D., Patchett, P. J., Söderlund, U., & Baker, M. (2004) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2004gc000721 · Cited by 579
Gao, S., Yang, J., Zhou, L., Li, M., Hu, Z., Guo, J., Yuan, H., Gong, H., Xiao, G., & Wei, J. (2011) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/02.2011.03 · Cited by 486
Hf–W–Th evidence for rapid growth of Mars and its status as a planetary embryo
Dauphas, N., & Pourmand, A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10077 · Cited by 476
Lin, J., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Hu, Z. (2016) · Solid Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sesci.2016.04.002 · Cited by 363
Ma, L., Jiang, S.-Y., Hofmann, A. W., Dai, B.-Z., Hou, M.-L., Zhao, K.-D., Chen, L.-H., Li, J.-W., & Jiang, Y.-H. (2014) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2013.09.035 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, N.-C., Taylor, R. N., Chavagnac, V., Nesbitt, R. W., Boella, R. M., Milton, J. A., German, C. R., Bayon, G., & Burton, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2002-11-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1567-1574
- ISSN
- 0267-9477 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5544
- OpenAlex
- W2099932450
- Cited by
- 1,253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hf isotope ratio analysis using multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: an evaluation of isobaric interference corrections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b206707b
- The paper
- Chu, N.-C., Taylor, R. N., Chavagnac, V., Nesbitt, R. W., Boella, R. M., Milton, J. A., German, C. R., Bayon, G., & Burton, K. (2002). Hf isotope ratio analysis using multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: an evaluation of isobaric interference corrections. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1039/b206707b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.