Mechanism of nuclear spin initiated para-H2 to ortho-H2 conversion
Abstract
In this paper a quantitative explanation for a diamagnetic ortho/para H2 conversion is given. The description is based on the quantum-mechanical density matrix formalism originally developed by Alexander and Binsch for studies of exchange processes in NMR spectra. Only the nuclear spin system is treated quantum-mechanically. Employing the model of a three spin system, the reactions of the hydrogen gas with the catalysts are treated as a phenomenological rate process, described by a rate constant. Numerical calculations reveal that for nearly all possible geometrical arrangements of the three spin system an efficient spin conversion is obtained. Only in the chemically improbable case of a linear group H-X-H no spin conversion is obtained. The efficiency of the spin conversion depends strongly on the lifetime of the H-X-H complex and on the presence of exchange interactions between the two hydrogens. Even moderate exchange couplings cause a quench of the spin conversion. Thus a sufficiently strong binding of the dihydrogen to the S spin is necessary to render the quenching by the exchange interaction ineffective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At environment temperature, the number of ortho states is 3 times that of para-H2 (75% ortho-25% para).
“Therefore, the number of ortho states is 3 times that of para-H2 at environment temperature (i.e., 75% ortho–25% para).69,150”
From Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review (2023) · cites this paper as [150]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 48 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Buntkowsky, G., Walaszek, B., Adamczyk, A., Xu, Y., Limbach, H.-H., & Chaudret, B.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Buntkowsky, G.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1929
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2149365942
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- nuclear spin conversion, three-spin system, exchange interaction, spin quenching
- MeSH terms
- Catalysis, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Hydrogen, Kinetics, Mathematics, Models, Chemical, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review