CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding enzyme immobilisation

Hanefeld, Ulf, Gardossi, Lucia, Magner, Edmond·2009·Chem. Soc. Rev.
DOI 10.1039/b711564b
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Enzymes are versatile catalysts in the laboratory and on an industrial scale. To broaden their applicability in the laboratory and to ensure their (re)use in manufacturing the stability of enzymes can often require improvement. Immobilisation can address the issue of enzymatic instability. Immobilisation can also help to enable the employment of enzymes in different solvents, at extremes of pH and temperature and exceptionally high substrate concentrations. At the same time substrate-specificity, enantioselectivity and reactivity can be modified. However, most often the molecular and physical-chemical bases of these phenomena have not been elucidated yet. This tutorial review focuses on the understanding of enzyme immobilisation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b711564b

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Veum, 2006, Chem. Commun., 825, 10.1039/b512366f · DOI
  2. R. A. Sheldon , I. W. C. E.Arends and U.Hanefeld, Green Chemistry and Catalysis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007 · DOI
  3. K. Faber , Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 5th edn, 2004 · DOI
  4. Pierre, 2004, Biocatal. Biotransform., 22, 145, 10.1080/10242420412331283314 · DOI
  5. U. T. Bornscheuer and R. J.Kazlauskas, Hydrolases in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2nd edn, 2006
  6. Avnir, 2006, J. Mater. Chem., 16, 1013, 10.1039/B512706H · DOI
  7. Mateo, 2007, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40, 1451, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.01.018 · DOI
  8. Sheldon, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 1289, 10.1002/adsc.200700082 · DOI
  9. L. Cao , Carrier-bound Immobilized Enzymes, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005 · DOI
  10. Industrial Biotransformations, ed. A. Liese, K. Seelbach and C. Wandrey, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006
  11. Basso, 2003, Tetrahedron Lett., 44, 5889, 10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01372-8 · DOI
  12. Yiu, 2005, J. Mater. Chem., 15, 3690, 10.1039/b506090g · DOI
  13. Ferrer, 2002, Biocatal. Biotransform., 20, 63, 10.1080/10242420210153 · DOI
  14. Persson, 2002, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 31, 833, 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00184-9 · DOI
  15. Salis, 2003, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 24–25, 75, 10.1016/S1381-1177(03)00112-7 · DOI
  16. Gupta, 2005, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 67, 648, 10.1007/s00253-004-1856-3 · DOI
  17. Kirk, 2002, Org. Process Res. Dev., 6, 446, 10.1021/op0200165 · DOI
  18. Heinsman, 2003, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 14, 2699, 10.1016/S0957-4166(03)00577-9 · DOI
  19. Veum, 2002, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1516, 10.1002/1099-0690(200205)2002:9<1516::AID-EJOC1516>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  20. Veum, 2005, Synlett, 2382
  21. Veld, 2007, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 5416, 10.1002/ejoc.200700568 · DOI
  22. Pellissier, 2008, Tetrahedron, 64, 1563, 10.1016/j.tet.2007.10.080 · DOI
  23. Rotticci, 2000, Org. Lett., 2, 1373, 10.1021/ol005639m · DOI
  24. Egholm Jacobsen, 2005, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 16, 847, 10.1016/j.tetasy.2004.11.081 · DOI
  25. Spizzo, 2007, Tetrahedron, 63, 11005, 10.1016/j.tet.2007.08.051 · DOI
  26. Basso, 2000, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 8, 245, 10.1016/S1381-1177(99)00075-2 · DOI
  27. Inagaki, 1992, J. Org. Chem., 57, 5643, 10.1021/jo00047a016 · DOI
  28. Costes, 2001, Biocatal. Biotransform., 19, 119, 10.3109/10242420109003640 · DOI
  29. Veum, 2005, Adv. Synth. Catal., 347, 1015, 10.1002/adsc.200505031 · DOI
  30. Veum, 2004, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 15, 3707, 10.1016/j.tetasy.2004.10.007 · DOI
  31. Basso, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 877, 10.1002/adsc.200600337 · DOI
  32. Roach, 2005, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 8168, 10.1021/ja042898o · DOI
  33. Persson, 2002, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 30, 916, 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00033-9 · DOI
  34. Basso, 2005, Tetrahedron, 61, 971, 10.1016/j.tet.2004.11.015 · DOI
  35. Torres, 2006, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 39, 167, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.03.025 · DOI
  36. Nahalka, 2003, Chem.–Eur. J., 9, 373, 10.1002/chem.200390038 · DOI
  37. Dräger, 2007, Org. Biomol. Chem., 5, 3657
  38. Hudson, 2005, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 19496, 10.1021/jp052102n · DOI
  39. Qiao, 2008, Chem.–Eur. J., 14, 151, 10.1002/chem.200701102 · DOI
  40. Deere, 2003, Biotechnol. Prog., 19, 1238, 10.1021/bp0340537 · DOI
  41. Hudson, 2007, Chem. Mater., 19, 2049, 10.1021/cm070180c · DOI
  42. Hudson, 2008, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 47, 8582, 10.1002/anie.200705238 · DOI
  43. Boller, 2002, Org. Process Res. Dev., 6, 509, 10.1021/op015506w · DOI
  44. Berger, 1991, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1198, 10.1039/C39910001198 · DOI
  45. Hara, 2008, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 50, 80, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.09.004 · DOI
  46. Orcaire, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 42, 106, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.08.002 · DOI
  47. Reetz, 2003, Adv. Synth. Catal., 345, 717, 10.1002/adsc.200303016 · DOI
  48. Veum, 2004, Tetrahedron, 60, 10419, 10.1016/j.tet.2004.06.135 · DOI
  49. Cabirol, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 1645, 10.1002/adsc.200606139 · DOI
  50. Goodford, 1985, J. Med. Chem., 28, 849, 10.1021/jm00145a002 · DOI
  51. van Langen, 2002, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 79, 224, 10.1002/bit.10280 · DOI
  52. Basso, 2000, Chem. Commun., 467, 10.1039/b000797h · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hanefeld, U., Gardossi, L., & Magner, E.
Venue
Chem. Soc. Rev.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2009
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
453-468
ISSN
  • 0306-0012
  • 1460-4744
DOI
10.1039/b711564b
Cited by
1,237
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review