The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nature and physical origin of CH/π interaction: significant difference from conventional hydrogen bonds
Abstract
Recently reported high-level ab initio calculations and gas phase spectroscopic measurements show that the nature of CH/pi interactions is considerably different from conventional hydrogen bonds, although the CH/pi interactions were often regarded as the weakest class of hydrogen bonds. The major source of attraction in the CH/pi interaction is the dispersion interaction and the electrostatic contribution is small, while the electrostatic interaction is mainly responsible for the attraction in the conventional hydrogen bonds. The nature of the "typical" CH/pi interactions is similar to that of van der Waals interactions, if some exceptional "activated" CH/pi interactions of highly acidic C-H bonds are excluded. Shifts of C-H vibrational frequencies and electronic spectra also support the similarity. The hydrogen bond is important in controlling structures of molecular assemblies, since the hydrogen bond is sufficiently strong and directional due to the large electrostatic contribution. On the other hand, the directionality of the "typical" CH/pi interaction is very weak. Although the "typical" CH/pi interaction is often regarded as an important interaction in controlling the structures of molecular assemblies as in the cases of conventional hydrogen bonds, the importance of the "typical" CH/pi interactions is questionable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures
Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M., & Diederich, F. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201007560 · Cited by 1,539
Local Nature of Substituent Effects in Stacking Interactions
Wheeler, S. E. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja202932e · Cited by 466
Cation–π interactions in organic crystals
Yamada, S. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213301 · Cited by 58
Pellowe, G. A., Voisin, T. B., Karpauskaite, L., Maslen, S. L., Roeselová, A., Skehel, J. M., Roustan, C., George, R., Nans, A., Kjær, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-025-01676-5 · Cited by 13
Platzer, G., Ptaszek, A. L., Böttcher, J., Fuchs, J. E., Geist, L., Braun, D., McConnell, D. B., Konrat, R., Sánchez‐Murcia, P. A., & Mayer, M. (2024) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.202300636 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsuzuki, S., & Fujii, A.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2584
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2051441149
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nature and physical origin of CH/π interaction: significant difference from conventional hydrogen bonds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b718656h
- The paper
- Tsuzuki, S., & Fujii, A. (2008). Nature and physical origin of CH/π interaction: significant difference from conventional hydrogen bonds. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/b718656h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.