Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Microfluidic generation of microgels from synthetic and natural polymers

Tumarkin, Ethan, Kumacheva, Eugenia·2009·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

In this tutorial review we discuss recent advances in the application of microfluidics for the generation of microgels from synthetic and biological polymers. We summarize advantages and drawbacks of the current methods used in microfluidic synthesis and assembly of polymer microgels. Continuous microfluidic encapsulation of cells is discussed as an exemplary application of the microgels. The article is finalized with a perspective on future research in the field. The article will be of interest to chemists, cell biologists, pharmacologists, and medicinal chemists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b809915b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tumarkin, E., & Kumacheva, E.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2009
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
2161
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2015067611
Cited by
275
References
0
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.