Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 649

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: a solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome

Friščić, Tomislav, Childs, Scott L., Rizvi, Syed A. A., Jones, William·2009·CrystEngComm

Abstract

Mechanochemical liquid-assisted grinding (LAG) and sonochemical (SonicSlurry) techniques have been compared as methods to construct four model pharmaceutical cocrystals involving theophylline and caffeine as pharmaceutical ingredients and L-malic or L-tartaric acid as pharmaceutical cocrystal formers. For these model systems, the results are interpreted using the parameter η, the ratio of solvent volume to sample weight. Each if the four cocrystals was studied in four different solvents using LAG at η = 0.25 and 10 µL mg−1, as well as SonicSlurry experiments at η = 2, 6 and 12 µL mg−1. The formation of the cocrystal is observed in all standard LAG experiments when η = 0.25 µL mg−1. Cocrystal formation by neat grinding, i.e. with no liquid added, was observed only for the cocrystal of theophylline and L-malic acid. LAG experiments at very low η values (below 0.5 µL mg−1) revealed that the rate of cocrystal formation depended on the choice of the liquid and increases with η. SonicSlurry experiments performed at higher η values of 2, 6 and 12 µL mg−1 provided three different outcomes: the pure cocrystal, a mixture of the cocrystal with a cocrystal component, or a single cocrystal component. LAG experiments at η = 10 µL mg−1 produced results consistent with the SonicSlurry experiments at η = 12 µL mg−1. Measuring approximate solubilities of individual cocrystal components revealed that product formation is not dictated by the specific processing method but by saturation levels of reactants. An experimental approach based on approximate solubilities of cocrystal components has been developed to qualitatively predict the outcome of cocrystallization experiments at different η values. As a general guideline, cocrystal formation is expected under conditions in which all cocrystal components remain saturated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b815174a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Friščić, T., Childs, S. L., Rizvi, S. A. A., & Jones, W.
Venue
CrystEngComm
Published
2009
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
418-426
ISSN
1466-8033 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071964185
Cited by
649
References
0
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: a solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b815174a
The paper
Friščić, T., Childs, S. L., Rizvi, S. A. A., & Jones, W. (2009). The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: a solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome. CrystEngComm. https://doi.org/10.1039/b815174a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.