The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: a solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome
Abstract
Mechanochemical liquid-assisted grinding (LAG) and sonochemical (SonicSlurry) techniques have been compared as methods to construct four model pharmaceutical cocrystals involving theophylline and caffeine as pharmaceutical ingredients and L-malic or L-tartaric acid as pharmaceutical cocrystal formers. For these model systems, the results are interpreted using the parameter η, the ratio of solvent volume to sample weight. Each if the four cocrystals was studied in four different solvents using LAG at η = 0.25 and 10 µL mg−1, as well as SonicSlurry experiments at η = 2, 6 and 12 µL mg−1. The formation of the cocrystal is observed in all standard LAG experiments when η = 0.25 µL mg−1. Cocrystal formation by neat grinding, i.e. with no liquid added, was observed only for the cocrystal of theophylline and L-malic acid. LAG experiments at very low η values (below 0.5 µL mg−1) revealed that the rate of cocrystal formation depended on the choice of the liquid and increases with η. SonicSlurry experiments performed at higher η values of 2, 6 and 12 µL mg−1 provided three different outcomes: the pure cocrystal, a mixture of the cocrystal with a cocrystal component, or a single cocrystal component. LAG experiments at η = 10 µL mg−1 produced results consistent with the SonicSlurry experiments at η = 12 µL mg−1. Measuring approximate solubilities of individual cocrystal components revealed that product formation is not dictated by the specific processing method but by saturation levels of reactants. An experimental approach based on approximate solubilities of cocrystal components has been developed to qualitatively predict the outcome of cocrystallization experiments at different η values. As a general guideline, cocrystal formation is expected under conditions in which all cocrystal components remain saturated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Landeros, J. M., & Juaristi, E. (2017) · European Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201601276 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Friščić, T., Childs, S. L., Rizvi, S. A. A., & Jones, W.
- Venue
- CrystEngComm
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 418-426
- ISSN
- 1466-8033 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071964185
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: a solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b815174a
- The paper
- Friščić, T., Childs, S. L., Rizvi, S. A. A., & Jones, W. (2009). The role of solvent in mechanochemical and sonochemical cocrystal formation: a solubility-based approach for predicting cocrystallisation outcome. CrystEngComm. https://doi.org/10.1039/b815174a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.