The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soft inertial microfluidics for high throughput separation of bacteria from human blood cells
Abstract
We developed a new approach to separate bacteria from human blood cells based on soft inertial force induced migration with flow defined curved and focused sample flow inside a microfluidic device. This approach relies on a combination of an asymmetrical sheath flow and proper channel geometry to generate a soft inertial force on the sample fluid in the curved and focused sample flow segment to deflect larger particles away while the smaller ones are kept on or near the original flow streamline. The curved and focused sample flow and inertial effect were visualized and verified using a fluorescent dye primed in the device. First the particle behaviour was studied in detail using 9.9 and 1.0 microm particles with a polymer-based prototype. The prototype device is compact with an active size of 3 mm(2). The soft inertial effect and deflection distance were proportional to the fluid Reynolds number (Re) and particle Reynolds number (Re(p)), respectively. We successfully demonstrated separation of bacteria (Escherichia coli) from human red blood cells at high cell concentrations (above 10(8)/mL), using a sample flow rate of up to 18 microL/min. This resulted in at least a 300-fold enrichment of bacteria at a wide range of flow rates with a controlled flow spreading. The separated cells were proven to be viable. Proteins from fractions before and after cell separation were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and staining to verify the removal of red blood cell proteins from the bacterial cell fraction. This novel microfluidic process is robust, reproducible, simple to perform, and has a high throughput compared to other cell sorting systems. Microfluidic systems based on these principles could easily be manufactured for clinical laboratory and biomedical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Cited by
Di Carlo, D. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b912547g · Cited by 1,627
Label-free cell separation and sorting in microfluidic systems
Gossett, D. R., Weaver, W. M., Mach, A. J., Hur, S. C., Tse, H. T. K., Lee, W., Amini, H., & Di Carlo, D. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3721-9 · Cited by 930
Microfluidics for cell separation
Bhagat, A. A. S., Bow, H., Hou, H. W., Tan, S. J., Han, J., & Lim, C. T. (2010) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-010-0611-4 · Cited by 632
Hydrodynamic mechanisms of cell and particle trapping in microfluidics
Karimi, A., Yazdi, S., & Ardekani, A. M. (2013) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.4799787 · Cited by 384
Continuous scalable blood filtration device using inertial microfluidics
Mach, A. J., & Di Carlo, D. (2010) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.22833 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Z., Willing, B., Bjerketorp, J., Jansson, J. K., & Hjort, K.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1193
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2052940427
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soft inertial microfluidics for high throughput separation of bacteria from human blood cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b817611f
- The paper
- Wu, Z., Willing, B., Bjerketorp, J., Jansson, J. K., & Hjort, K. (2009). Soft inertial microfluidics for high throughput separation of bacteria from human blood cells. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817611f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.