The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Baseline correction using adaptive iteratively reweighted penalized least squares
Abstract
Baseline drift always blurs or even swamps signals and deteriorates analytical results, particularly in multivariate analysis. It is necessary to correct baseline drift to perform further data analysis. Simple or modified polynomial fitting has been found to be effective to some extent. However, this method requires user intervention and is prone to variability especially in low signal-to-noise ratio environments. A novel algorithm named adaptive iteratively reweighted Penalized Least Squares (airPLS) that does not require any user intervention and prior information, such as peak detection etc., is proposed in this work. The method works by iteratively changing weights of sum squares errors (SSE) between the fitted baseline and original signals, and the weights of the SSE are obtained adaptively using the difference between the previously fitted baseline and the original signals. The baseline estimator is fast and flexible. Theory, implementation, and applications in simulated and real datasets are presented. The algorithm is implemented in R language and MATLAB, which is available as open source software (http://code.google.com/p/airpls).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
Holland, P. W., & Welsch, R. E. (1977) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610927708827533 · Cited by 2,115
Cited by
Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction
Liu, R., Wei, Z., Peng, L., Zhang, L., Zohar, A., Schoeppner, R., Wang, P., Wan, C., Zhu, D., Liu, H., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4 · Cited by 573
Deep convolutional neural networks for Raman spectrum recognition: a unified solution
Liu, J., Osadchy, M., Ashton, L., Foster, M., Solomon, C. J., & Gibson, S. J. (2017) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c7an01371j · Cited by 507
Baseline correction using asymmetrically reweighted penalized least squares smoothing
Baek, S.-J., Park, A., Ahn, Y.-J., & Choo, J. (2015) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c4an01061b · Cited by 477
Chemometric methods in data processing of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: A review
Yi, L., Dong, N., Yun, Y., Deng, B., Ren, D., Liu, S., & Liang, Y. (2016) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.001 · Cited by 305
Self-citationPan, L., Zhang, P., Daengngam, C., Peng, S., & Chongcheawchamnan, M. (2022) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.6225 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z.-M., Chen, S., & Liang, Y.-Z.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1138
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2016365402
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.