The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering nanostructured electrodes and fabrication of film electrodes for efficient lithium ion intercalation
Abstract
Lithium ion batteries have been one of the major power supplies for small electronic devices since the last century. However, with the rapid advancement of electronics and the increasing demand for clean sustainable energy, newer lithium ion batteries with higher energy density, higher power density, and better cyclic stability are needed. In addition, newer generations of lithium ion batteries must meet the requirements of low and easy fabrication cost and be free of toxic materials. There have been many novel approaches to gain high energy storage capacities and charge/discharge rates without sacrificing the battery cyclic life. Nanostructured electrodes are seemingly the most promising candidate for future lithium ion batteries. Modification of the electrode surface chemistry and the control of appropriate crystallinity are also reported to improve the electrode intercalation capabilities. The study of appropriately designed nanostructures, interfaces and crystallinity has also promoted and is accompanied with the development of thin film electrodes without the addition of binders and conductive carbon that are typically used in the fabrication of traditional lithium ion battery electrodes, simplifying the electrode fabrication process and enhancing electrode storage density. In this perspective, we summarize and discuss the efforts of fabricating nanostructures, modifying surface chemistry and manipulating crystallinity to achieve enhanced lithium ion intercalation capacities, rate capabilities and cyclic stability, as well as the direct fabrication of binderless film electrodes with desirable nano- and microstructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized syntheses of large-pore mesoporous metal oxides with semicrystalline frameworks
Yang, P., Zhao, D., Margolese, D. I., Chmelka, B. F., & Stucky, G. D. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/24132 · Cited by 2,493
Electron Transport Materials for Organic Light-Emitting Diodes
Kulkarni, A. P., Tonzola, C. J., Babel, A., & Jenekhe, S. A. (2004) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm049473l · Cited by 1,624
Capacity Fade Mechanisms and Side Reactions in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Arora, P., White, R. E., & Doyle, M. (1998) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1838857 · Cited by 1,408
Electrically conductive oxide aerogels: new materials in electrochemistry
Rolison, D. R., & Dunn, B. (2001) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b007591o · Cited by 357
Cited by
Qi, W., Shapter, J. G., Wu, Q., Yin, T., Gao, G., & Cui, D. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta05283a · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, D., & Cao, G.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1218
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2148215351
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering nanostructured electrodes and fabrication of film electrodes for efficient lithium ion intercalation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b922656g
- The paper
- Liu, D., & Cao, G. (2010). Engineering nanostructured electrodes and fabrication of film electrodes for efficient lithium ion intercalation. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/b922656g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.