UVA-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in DNA: a direct photochemical mechanism?
Open accessAbstract
The carcinogenic action of UVA radiation is commonly attributed to DNA oxidation mediated by endogenous photosensitisers. Yet, it was recently shown that cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD), well known for their involvement in UVB genotoxicity, are produced in larger yield than oxidative lesions in UVA-irradiated cells and skin. In the present work, we gathered mechanistic information on this photoreaction by comparing formation of all possible bipyrimidine photoproducts upon UVA irradiation of cells, purified genomic DNA and dA(20):dT(20) oligonucleotide duplex. We observed that the distribution of photoproducts, characterized by the sole formation of CPD and the absence of (6-4) photoproducts was similar in the three types of samples. The CPD involving two thymines represented 90% of the amount of photoproducts. Moreover, the yields of formation of the DNA lesions were similar in cells and isolated DNA. In addition, the effect of the wavelength of the incident photons was found to be the same in isolated DNA and cells. This set of data shows that UVA-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are formed via a direct photochemical mechanism, without mediation of a cellular photosensitiser. This is possible because the double-stranded structure increases the capacity of DNA bases to absorb UVA photons, as evidenced in the case of the oligomer dA(20):dT(20). These results emphasize the need to consider UVA in the carcinogenic effects of sunlight. An efficient photoprotection is needed that can only be complete by completely blocking incident photons, rather than by systemic approaches such as antioxidant supplementation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
UVA-induced CPDs are formed via a direct photochemical mechanism without mediation of a cellular photosensitizer.
“UVA-induced CPD are formed via a direct photochemical mechanism without mediation of a cellular photosensitizer [26].”
From Molecular Mechanisms of UV-Induced Apoptosis and Its Effects on Skin Residential Cells: The Implication in UV-Based Phototherapy (2013) · cites this paper as [26]
Absorption of UVA photons by DNA is well documented and is driven by stacking of bases in the double helix.
“It may be added, although being a much lower process than in the UVC and UVB ranges, that absorption of UVA photons by DNA is a well-documented fact (94) that was recently shown to be driven by the stacking of bases in the double helix (95,96).”
From Photoinduced Damage to Cellular DNA: Direct and Photosensitized Reactions<sup>†</sup> (2012) · cites this paper as [96]
The yields of UVA-induced CPDs are similar in isolated and cellular DNA.
“Comparative experiments showed that the yields of UVA-induced CPDs were similar in isolated and cellular DNA (55,96,97).”
From Photoinduced Damage to Cellular DNA: Direct and Photosensitized Reactions<sup>†</sup> (2012) · cites this paper as [96]
DNA absorbs only slightly in the lower UVA range up to 340 nm, leading mostly to cis-syn T<>T through delocalization of excited-state transients over several nucleobases.
“As already mentioned, DNA only absorbs slightly in the lower part of the UVA range of solar radiation up to 340 nm, leading mostly to the formation of cis-syn T<>T through delocalization of excited state transients on several nucleobases (95,96).”
From Photoinduced Damage to Cellular DNA: Direct and Photosensitized Reactions<sup>†</sup> (2012) · cites this paper as [96]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 149
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- F. El Ghissassi, R. Baan, K. Straif, Y. Grosse, B. Secretan, V. Bouvard, L. Benbrahim-Tallaa, N. Guha, C. Freeman, L. Galichet and V. Cogliano, Lancet Oncol., 2009, 10, 751- 752.
- E. A. Drobetsky, J. Turcotte and A. Chateauneuf, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92, 2350-2354.
- A. Stary, C. Robert and A. Sarasin, Mutat. Res., 1997, 383, 1-8.
- J. Cadet, T. Douki, J. L. Ravanat and P. Di Mascio, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2009, 8, 903-911.
- S. Courdavault, C. Baudouin, M. Charveron, A. Favier, J. Cadet and T. Douki, Mutat. Res., 2004, 556, 135-142.
- R. M. Tyrrell, Photochem. Photobiol., 1973, 17, 69-73.
- T. Douki, A. Reynaud-Angelin, J. Cadet and E. Sage, Biochemistry, 2003, 42, 9221-9226.
- S. Mouret, C. Baudouin, M. Charveron, A. Favier, J. Cadet and T. Douki, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2006, 103, 13765-13770.
- A. R. Young, C. A. Chadwick, G. I. Harrison, O. Nikaido, J. Ramsden and C. S. Potten, J. Invest. Dermtol., 1998, 111, 982-928.
- D. Perdiz, P. Grof, M. Mezzina, O. Nikaido, E. Moustacchi and E. Sage, J. Biol. Chem., 2000, 275, 26732-26742.
- Y. H. You, D. H. Lee, J. H. Yoon, S. Nakajima, A. Yasui and G. P. Pfeifer, J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276, 44688-44694.
- U. P. Kappes, D. Luo, M. Potter, K. Schulmeister and T. M. Rünger, J. Invest. Dermtol., 2006, 126, 667-675.
- P. J. Rochette, J.-P. Therrien, R. Drouin, D. Perdiz, N. Bastien, E. A. Drobetsky and E. Sage, Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31, 2786-2794.
- F. Bosca, V. Lhiaubet-Vallet, M. C. Cuquerella, J. V. Castell and M. A. Miranda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6318-6319.
- V. Lhiaubet-Vallett, J. Trzcionka, S. Encinas, M. A. Miranda and N. Chouini-Lalanne, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 14148-14153.
- I. G. Gut, P. D. Wood and R. W. Redmond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 2366-2373.
- F. E. Quaite, B. M. Sutherland and J. C. Sutherland, Nature, 1992, 358, 576-578.
- X. S. Zhang, B. S. Rosenstein, Y. Wang, M. Lebwohl, D. M. Mitchell and H. C. Wei, Photochem. Photobiol., 1997, 65, 119-124.
- Y. Jiang, M. Rabbi, M. Kim, C. H. Ke, W. Lee, R. L. Clark, P. A. Mieczkowski and P. E. Marszalek, Biophys. J., 2009, 96, 1151-1158.
- A. P. Schuch, R. D. Galhardo, K. M. de Lima-Bessa, N. J. Schuch and C. F. M. Menck, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2009, 8, 111-120.
- S. Frelon, T. Douki, A. Favier and J. Cadet, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 2866-2870.
- D. Markovitsi, T. Gustavsson and F. Talbot, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2007, 6, 717-724.
- C. E. Crespo-Hernandez, B. Cohen and B. Kohler, Nature, 2005, 436, 1141-1144.
- D. Markovitsi, F. Talbot, T. Gustavsson, D. Onidas, E. Lazzarotto and S. Marguet, Nature, 2006, 441, E7; discussion E8.
- I. Buchvarov, Q. Wang, M. Raytchev, A. Trifonov and T. Fiebig, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2007, 104, 4794-4797.
- D. Markovitsi, A. Sharonov, D. Onidas and T. Gustavsson, Chemphyschem, 2003, 4, 303-305.
- F. Santoro, V. Barone and R. Improta, Chemphyschem, 2008, 9, 2531-2537.
- J. C. Sutherland and K. P. Griffin, Radiat. Res., 1981, 86, 399-409.
- D. Markovitsi, D. Onidas, T. Gustavsson, F. Talbot and E. Lazzarotto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17130-17131.
- A. W. Lange and J. M. Herbert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3913-3922.
- F. Santoro, V. Barone and R. Improta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 15232-15245.
- S. Courdavault, C. Baudouin, M. Charveron, B. Canghilem, A. Favier, J. Cadet and T. Douki, DNA Repair, 2005, 4, 836-844.
- S. Matallana-Surget, J. A. Meador, F. Joux and T. Douki, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2008, 7, 794-801.
- C. Kielbassa, L. Roza and B. Epe, Carcinogenesis, 1997, 18, 811-816.
- E. Kvam and R. M. Tyrrell, Carcinogenesis, 1997, 18, 2281- 2283.
- T. Douki, M. Court, S. Sauvaigo, F. Odin and J. Cadet, J. Biol. Chem., 2000, 275, 11678-11685.
- T. Douki and J. Cadet, Biochemistry, 2001, 40, 2495-2501.
- A. Banyasz, S. Karpati, E. Lazzarotto, D. Markovitsi and T. Douki, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 11747-11750.
- Authors
- Mouret, S., Philippe, C., Gracia-Chantegrel, J., Banyasz, A., Karpati, S., Markovitsi, D., & Douki, T.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Douki, Thierry
- Venue
- Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1706
- ISSN
- 1477-0520 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0539
- OpenAlex
- W1966360175
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 19.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-07-PCVI-0004)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Keywords
- UVA, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, DNA photoproducts, 6-4 photoproducts, DNA oxidation, photosensitizers, photoprotection, wavelength dependence, oligonucleotide duplexes, skin cancer
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Cells, Cultured, Clostridium perfringens, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Photochemistry, Pyrimidine Dimers, Ultraviolet Rays, Keratinocytes, Genome, Bacterial, Micrococcus luteus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review