The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multidimensional analysis of the frequencies and rates of cytokine secretion from single cells by quantitative microengraving
Open accessAbstract
The large diversity of cells that comprise the human immune system requires methods that can resolve the individual contributions of specific subsets to an immunological response. Microengraving is process that uses a dense, elastomeric array of microwells to generate microarrays of proteins secreted from large numbers of individual live cells (approximately 10(4)-10(5) cells/assay). In this paper, we describe an approach based on this technology to quantify the rates of secretion from single immune cells. Numerical simulations of the microengraving process indicated an operating regime between 30 min-4 h that permits quantitative analysis of the rates of secretion. Through experimental validation, we demonstrate that microengraving can provide quantitative measurements of both the frequencies and the distribution in rates of secretion for up to four cytokines simultaneously released from individual viable primary immune cells. The experimental limits of detection ranged from 0.5 to 4 molecules/s for IL-6, IL-17, IFNgamma, IL-2, and TNFalpha. These multidimensional measures resolve the number and intensities of responses by cells exposed to stimuli with greater sensitivity than single-parameter assays for cytokine release. We show that cells from different donors exhibit distinct responses based on both the frequency and magnitude of cytokine secretion when stimulated under different activating conditions. Primary T cells with specific profiles of secretion can also be recovered after microengraving for subsequent expansion in vitro. These examples demonstrate the utility of quantitative, multidimensional profiles of single cells for analyzing the diversity and dynamics of immune responses in vitro and for identifying rare cells from clinical samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system
Perfetto, S. P., Chattopadhyay, P. K., & Roederer, M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1416 · Cited by 1,019
Cited by
Biosensor technology: recent advances in threat agent detection and medicine
Kirsch, J., Siltanen, C., Zhou, Q., Revzin, A., & Simonian, A. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60141b · Cited by 462
Kartikasari, A. E. R., Huertas, C. S., Mitchell, A., & Plebanski, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.692142 · Cited by 343
Bioanalytical Chemistry of Cytokines–a Review
Stenken, J. A., & Poschenrieder, A. J. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.009 · Cited by 302
In vivo discovery of immunotherapy targets in the tumour microenvironment
Zhou, P., Shaffer, D. R., Alvarez Arias, D. A., Nakazaki, Y., Pos, W., Torres, A. J., Cremasco, V., Dougan, S. K., Cowley, G. S., Elpek, K., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12988 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, Q., Bradshaw, E. M., Nilsson, B., Hafler, D. A., & Love, J. C.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1391
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2165032821
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.