The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reversible and robust CO2 capture by equimolar task-specific ionic liquid–superbase mixtures
Abstract
Integrated sorption systems consisting of 1 : 1 mixtures of an alcohol-functionalized ionic liquid and a superbase were found to be effective for CO2 capture under atmospheric pressure, eliminating the use of volatile n-alkanols or water. Conversely, by using the current approach, there is no longer a requirement for maintaining scrupulously dry conditions. The effect of ionic liquid structure, choice of superbase, their relative ratios, the sorption temperature, and the reaction time on the absorption and release of CO2 were investigated. Our results demonstrate that (i) this integrated ionic liquid–superbase system is capable of rapid and reversible capture of nearly one mole of CO2 per mole of superbase, (ii) the captured CO2 can be readily released by either mild heating or bubbling with an insert gas (N2, Ar), and (iii) this novel CO2 chemisorption platform can be recycled with minimal loss of activity. This efficient and fully reversible catch-and-release process using non-volatile, task-specific ionic liquids provides an excellent alternative to current CO2 capture technologies, which are based largely around volatile alkanols or alkylamines. Furthermore, our integrated ionic liquid–superbase system can be used as a novel medium for supported liquid membranes, for which they demonstrate both good selectivity and permeability in model CO2/N2 gas separations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
H. Davis, J. (2004) · Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1246/cl.2004.1072 · Cited by 1,053
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Deep Eutectic Solvents: Physicochemical Properties and Gas Separation Applications
García, G., Aparicio, S., Ullah, R., & Atilhan, M. (2015) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef5028873 · Cited by 1,112
Ionic Liquids-Based Extraction: A Promising Strategy for the Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Sun, X., Luo, H., & Dai, S. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200193x · Cited by 852
Self-citationReview of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture
Kenarsari, S. D., Yang, D., Jiang, G., Zhang, S., Wang, J., Russell, A. G., Wei, Q., & Fan, M. (2013) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c3ra43965h · Cited by 784
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Mahurin, S. M., Luo, H., Baker, G. A., Li, H., & Dai, S.
- Venue
- Green Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 870
- ISSN
- 1463-9262 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9270
- OpenAlex
- W2113424106
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversible and robust CO2 capture by equimolar task-specific ionic liquid–superbase mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b927514b
- The paper
- Wang, C., Mahurin, S. M., Luo, H., Baker, G. A., Li, H., & Dai, S. (2010). Reversible and robust CO2 capture by equimolar task-specific ionic liquid–superbase mixtures. Green Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/b927514b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.