The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic fast pyrolysis of wood sawdust
Open accessAbstract
Catalytic fast pyrolysis of pine wood sawdust and furan (a model biomass compound) with ZSM-5 based catalysts was studied with three different reactors: a bench scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor, a fixed bed reactor and a semi-batch pyroprobe reactor. The highest aromatic yield from sawdust of 14% carbon in the fluidized bed reactor was obtained at low biomass weight hourly space velocities (less than 0.5 h−1) and high temperature (600 °C). Olefins (primarily ethylene and propylene) were also produced with a carbon yield of 5.4% carbon. The biomass weight hourly space velocity and the reactor temperature can be used to control both aromatic yield and selectivity. At low biomass WHSV the more valuable monocyclic aromatics are produced and the formation of less valuable polycyclic aromatics is inhibited. Lowering the reaction temperature also results in more valuable monocyclic aromatics. The olefins produced during the reaction can be recycled to the reactor to produce additional aromatics. Propylene is more reactive than ethylene. Co-feeding propylene to the reactor results in a higher aromatic yield in both continuous reactors and higher conversion of the intermediate furan in the fixed bed reactor. When olefins are recycled aromatic yields from wood of 20% carbon can be obtained. After ten reaction–regeneration cycles there were metal impurities deposited on the catalyst, however, the acid sites on the zeolite are not affected. Of the three reactors tested the batch pyroprobe reactor yielded the most aromatics, however, the aromatic product is largely naphthalene. The continuous reactors produce less naphthalene and the sum of aromatics plus olefin products is higher than the pyroprobe reactor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Cited by
Zhang, H., Cheng, Y.-T., Vispute, T. P., Xiao, R., & Huber, G. W. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01230d · Cited by 513
Self-citationCatalytic co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with polymers: a critical review
Zhang, X., Lei, H., Chen, S., & Wu, J. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c6gc00911e · Cited by 497
Chen, X., Che, Q., Li, S., Liu, Z., Yang, H., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Shao, J., & Chen, H. (2019) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106180 · Cited by 460
Cheng, Y., Jae, J., Shi, J., Fan, W., & Huber, G. W. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201107390 · Cited by 435
Self-citationCheng, Y.-T., & Huber, G. W. (2011) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs200103j · Cited by 337
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, T. R., Cheng, Y.-T., Jae, J., & Huber, G. W.
- Venue
- Energy Environ. Sci.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-161
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2035373899
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic fast pyrolysis of wood sawdust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0ee00341g
- The paper
- Carlson, T. R., Cheng, Y.-T., Jae, J., & Huber, G. W. (2011). Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic fast pyrolysis of wood sawdust. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00341g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.