The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on non-precious metal electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cells
Abstract
With the approaching commercialization of PEM fuel cell technology, developing active, inexpensive non-precious metal ORR catalyst materials to replace currently used Pt-based catalysts is a necessary and essential requirement in order to reduce the overall system cost. This review paper highlights the progress made over the past 40 years with a detailed discussion of recent works in the area of non-precious metal electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction, a necessary reaction at the PEM fuel cell cathode. Several important kinds of unsupported or carbon supported non-precious metal electrocatalysts for ORR are reviewed, including non-pyrolyzed and pyrolyzed transition metal nitrogen-containing complexes, conductive polymer-based catalysts, transition metal chalcogenides, metal oxides/carbides/nitrides/oxynitrides/carbonitrides, and enzymatic compounds. Among these candidates, pyrolyzed transition metal nitrogen-containing complexes supported on carbon materials (M–Nx/C) are considered the most promising ORR catalysts because they have demonstrated some ORR activity and stability close to that of commercially available Pt/C catalysts. Although great progress has been achieved in this area of research and development, there are still some challenges in both their ORR activity and stability. Regarding the ORR activity, the actual volumetric activity of the most active non-precious metal catalyst is still well below the DOE 2015 target. Regarding the ORR stability, stability tests are generally run at low current densities or low power levels, and the lifetime is far shorter than targets set by DOE. Therefore, improving both the ORR activity and stability are the major short and long term focuses of non-precious metal catalyst research and development. Based on the results achieved in this area, several future research directions are also proposed and discussed in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gasteiger, H. A., Kocha, S. S., Sompalli, B., & Wagner, F. T. (2005) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 · Cited by 4,876
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Cited by
Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting
Zou, X., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00448e · Cited by 5,955
Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00470a · Cited by 5,388
Metal Catalysts for Heterogeneous Catalysis: From Single Atoms to Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles
Liu, L., & Corma, A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00776 · Cited by 4,777
Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Shao, M., Chang, Q., Dodelet, J.-P., & Chenitz, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 · Cited by 3,903
Metal–air batteries: from oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts
Cheng, F., & Chen, J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15228a · Cited by 2,677
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Higgins, D., Yu, A., Zhang, L., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3167
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2031302556
- Cited by
- 1,832
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.