The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon capture in metal–organic frameworks—a comparative study
Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been shown to be excellent materials for storage of carbon dioxide, implying that they could be useful for removal of carbon dioxide from flue gas stacks, however their performance in industrially relevant swing adsorption processes for carbon capture has not been studied. Here we show that the efficacy of MOFs for carbon capture depends dramatically on the process and that some MOFs can provide significant carbon capture under typical pressure and vacuum swing processes. In particular, MOFs that possess coordinatively unsaturated metal centers offer as much as 9 mmol g−1 swing capacity under certain conditions. The results herein clearly show that there is no single ideal compound for carbon capture applications and that different materials can perform better or worse depending on the specific process conditions. In addition to their capture performances, we have also investigated their selectivity to carbon dioxide over that of nitrogen and methane. The analysis provided clearly demonstrates that the performance of a given MOF cannot be determined without also considering the detailed industrial process in which the MOF is to be applied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
Reducing the Cost of CO 2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie070831e · Cited by 566
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Kökçam-Demir, Ü., Goldman, A., Esrafili, L., Gharib, M., Morsali, A., Weingart, O., & Janiak, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00609e · Cited by 895
A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001 · Cited by 707
Photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction in metal-organic frameworks: A mini-review
Wang, C.-C., Du, X.-D., Li, J., Guo, X.-X., Wang, P., & Zhang, J. (2016) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.030 · Cited by 659
Assessment of the Role of Micropore Size and N-Doping in CO 2 Capture by Porous Carbons
Sevilla, M., Parra, J. B., & Fuertes, A. B. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am401423b · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Simmons, J. M., Wu, H., Zhou, W., & Yildirim, T.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2177
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W1972427151
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon capture in metal–organic frameworks—a comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c0ee00700e
- The paper
- Simmons, J. M., Wu, H., Zhou, W., & Yildirim, T. (2011). Carbon capture in metal–organic frameworks—a comparative study. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00700e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.