A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In zeolites and zeolite-type adsorbents, most research has focused on commercial type A, X, and Y zeolites, out of which zeolite 13X (NaX) is considered a benchmark adsorbent for postcombustion CO2 removal.
“In what refers to zeolites and zeolite-type adsorbents (AlPOs, SAPOs, and titanosilicates), most research has focused on commercial type A, X, and Y zeolites, out of which zeolite 13X (NaX) is considered a benchmark adsorbent for postcombustion CO2 removal.331,461,545−547,551,552”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [546]
Separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs.
“The separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on different adsorbents, including activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs,331−333,543,545−550”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [546]
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876 · see citing works
CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications – A review
Olajire, A. A. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.030 · Cited by 1,217 · see citing works
Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture
Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00784f · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Wei, J., Zhou, D., Sun, Z., Deng, Y., Xia, Y., & Zhao, D. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201202764 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Reducing the Cost of CO <sub>2</sub> Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie070831e · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Alkali and alkaline-earth cation exchanged chabazite zeolites for adsorption based CO2 capture
Zhang, J., Singh, R., & Webley, P. A. (2008) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.022 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Adsorption equilibria and kinetics of CO2, CH4 and N2 in natural zeolites
Hernández-Huesca, R., Dı́az, L., & Aguilar-Armenta, G. (1999) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/s1383-5866(98)00094-x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Life Cycle Inventory of CO<sub>2</sub> in an Enhanced Oil Recovery System
Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M., & McCoy, S. T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902006h · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Hong, W. Y. (2022) · Carbon Capture Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Trends in Solid Adsorbent Materials Development for CO <sub>2</sub> Capture
Pardakhti, M., Jafari, T., Tobin, Z., Dutta, B., Moharreri, E., Shemshaki, N. S., Suib, S., & Srivastava, R. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b08487 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Adsorption of CO2 from flue gas by novel seaweed-based KOH-activated porous biochars
Ding, S., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116382 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Chemically modified carbonaceous adsorbents for enhanced CO2 capture: A review
Kamran, U., & Park, S.-J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125776 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationDissanayake, P. D., Choi, S. W., Igalavithana, A. D., Yang, X., Tsang, D. C. W., Wang, C.-H., Kua, H. W., Lee, K. B., & Ok, Y. S. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109785 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Siegelman, R. L., Milner, P. J., Kim, E. J., Weston, S. C., & Long, J. R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee00505f · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Carbon Capture Technologies: A Review on Technology Readiness Level
Hekmatmehr, H., Esmaeili, A., Pourmahdi, M., Atashrouz, S., Abedi, A., Ali Abuswer, M., Nedeljkovic, D., Latifi, M., Farag, S., & Mohaddespour, A. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130898 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Development trends in porous adsorbents for carbon capture
Sreenivasulu, B., Sreedhar, I., Suresh, P., & Raghavan, K. V. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03149 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Recent developments and consideration issues in solid adsorbents for CO2 capture from flue gas
Nie, L., Mu, Y., Jin, J., Chen, J., & Mi, J. (2018) · Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2018.07.012 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Performance exploration of temperature swing adsorption technology for carbon dioxide capture
Jiang, L., Roskilly, A. P., & Wang, R. Z. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.077 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Hossain, S. M. Z., Sultana, N., Razzak, S. A., & Hossain, M. M. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.112016 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Pérez-Botella, E., Palomino, M., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2019) · Green Energy and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3504-4_7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Experimental and theoretical assessment of CO2 capture by adsorption on clinoptilolite
Diógenes, T. S., Santiago, R. G., Maia, D. A. S., Gonçalves, D. V., Azevedo, D. C. S., Lucena, S. M. P., & Bastos-Neto, M. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.033 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J.
- Affiliations
- Inha University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Soo-Jin
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1226-086X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027053970
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 40.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, solid sorbents, post-combustion CO2 capture, carbon capture and storage, zeolites, silica, metal-organic frameworks, porous polymers, alkali metal carbonates, activated carbon, activated carbon fiber, graphene, carbon adsorbents, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
